Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A comparative study of uncertainty propagation methods for black-box-type problems

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A wide variety of uncertainty propagation methods exist in literature; however, there is a lack of good understanding of their relative merits. In this paper, a comparative study on the performances of several representative uncertainty propagation methods, including a few newly developed methods that have received growing attention, is performed. The full factorial numerical integration, the univariate dimension reduction method, and the polynomial chaos expansion method are implemented and applied to several test problems. They are tested under different settings of the performance nonlinearity, distribution types of input random variables, and the magnitude of input uncertainty. The performances of those methods are compared in moment estimation, tail probability calculation, and the probability density function construction, corresponding to a wide variety of scenarios of design under uncertainty, such as robust design, and reliability-based design optimization. The insights gained are expected to direct designers for choosing the most applicable uncertainty propagation technique in design under uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1972) Handbook of mathematical functions (10th edn.). Dover, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bucher CG (1988) Adaptive sampling—an iterative fast Monte Carlo procedure. Struct Saf 5:119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi SK, Grandhi RV, Canfield RA (2004) Structural reliability under non-Gaussian stochastic behavior. Comput Struct 82:1113–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen P, Baker MJ (1982) Structural reliability theory and its applications. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Creveling CM (1997) Tolerance design: a handbook for developing optimal specifications. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Errico JR, Zaino NA (1988) Statistical tolerancing using a modification of Taguchi’s method. Technometrics 30:397–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du X, Chen W (2000) Towards a better understanding of modeling feasibility robustness in engineering design. J Mech Des 122:385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du X, Sudjianto A, Chen W (2004) An integrated framework for optimization under uncertainty using inverse reliability strategy. J Mech Des 126:562–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelund S, Rackwitz R (1993) A benchmark study on importance sampling techniques in structural reliability. Struct Saf 12:255–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans DH (1972) An application of numerical integration techniques to statistical tolerancing, III: general distributions. Technometrics 14:23–35

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fiessler B, Rackwitz R, Neumann H (1979) Quadratic limit states in structural reliability. J Eng Mech 105:661–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghanem RG, Spanos PD (1991) Stochastic finite elements: a spectral approach. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hasofer AM, Lind NC (1974) Exact and invariant second order code format. J Eng Mech 100(NEM1):111–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn GJ, Shapiro SS (1967) Statistical models in engineering. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelrigg GA (1998) A framework for decision-based engineering design. J Mech Des 120:653–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson NL, Kotz S, Balakrishnan N (1994) Continuous univariate distributions (vol 1). Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kiureghian AD (1996) Structural reliability methods for seismic safety assessment: a review. Eng Struct 18:412–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokkolaras M, Mourelatos ZP, Papalambros PY (2006) Design optimization of hierarchically decomposed multilevel system under uncertainty. J Mech Des 128:503–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law AM, Kelton WD (1982) Simulation modeling ands analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee TW, Kwak BM (1987–88) A reliability-based optimal design using advanced first order second moment method. Mech Struct Mach 15:523–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SH, Kwak BM (2006) Response surface augmented moment method for efficient reliability analysis. Struct Saf 28:261–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee I, Choi KK, Du L (2007) A new inverse reliability analysis method using MPP-based dimension reduction method (DRM). In: Proceedings of ASME 2007 international design engineering technical conference and computers and information in engineering conference (IDETC/CIE2007), Las Vegas, NV, USA

  • Liu W, Belytschko T, Mani A (1986) Random field finite elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 23:1831–1845

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Chen W, Kokkolaras M, Papalambros PY, Kim HM (2006) Probabilistic analytical target cascading: a moment matching formulation for multilevel optimization under uncertainty. J Mech Des 128:991–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen HO, Krenk S, Lind NC (2006) Methods of structural safety. Dover, Mineola, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister CD, Simpson TW (2003) Multidisciplinary robust design optimization of an internal combustion engine. J Mech Des 125:124–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melchers RE (1989) Importance sampling in structural systems. Struct Saf 6:3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rackwitz R, Fiessler B (1978) Structural reliability under combined random load sequences. Comput Struct 9:489–494

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman S, Wei D (2006) A univariate approximation at most probable point for higher-order reliability analysis. Int J Solids Struct 43:2820–2839

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman S, Xu H (2004) A univariate dimension-reduction method for multi-dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics. Probab Eng Mech 19:393–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo HS, Kwak BM (2002) Efficient statistical tolerance analysis for general distributions using three-point information. Int J Prod Res 40:931–944

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shoutens W (2000) Stochastic processes and orthogonal polynomials. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi G (1978) Performance analysis design. Int J Prod Res 16:521–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatang MA (1995) Direct incorporation of uncertainty in chemical and environmental engineering systems. Ph.D. thesis, MIT

  • Wan X, Karniadakis GE (2006) Multi-element generalized polynomial chaos for arbitrary probability measure. SIAM J Sci Comput 28:901–928

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wu YT (1994) Computational methods for efficient structural reliability and reliability sensitivity analysis. AIAA J 32:1717–1723

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xiu D (2007) Efficient collocatioal approach for parametric uncertainty analysis. Commun Comput Phys 2:293–309

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xiu D, Karniadakis GE (2003) Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos. J Comput Phis 187:137–167

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Rahman S (2004) A generalized dimension-reduction method for multi-dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61:1992–2019

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Choi KK, Park YH (2003) Hybrid analysis method for reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 125:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Xi Z, Wells LJ, Wang P (2006) Enhanced dimension reduction (eDR) method for sensitivity-free uncertainty quantification. In: Proceedings of 11th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, Portsmouth, VA, USA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Rd Tech B224, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA

    S. H. Lee & W. Chen

Authors
  1. S. H. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S.H., Chen, W. A comparative study of uncertainty propagation methods for black-box-type problems. Struct Multidisc Optim 37, 239–253 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-008-0234-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-008-0234-7

Keywords