Skip to main content
Log in

Cracking Through Hegemonic Ideology: The Logic of Formal Justice

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this analysis I argue for the independent effects on social change of the internal logic of formal justice. Institutionally, oppositional ideas that challenge the legitimacy of a hegemonic system emerge in “safe spaces” that subordinate groups create within a culture dominated by hegemonic ideas. The oppositional ideas derive in part from an existing informal culture of opposition, access to repertories of contention, and favorable openings in the political system. In addition, however, these ideas are often propelled independently by the logic of formal justice, in which, when the reasons for separate treatment have been discredited, equality is the default option. The analysis demonstrates the power of this logic and suggests that it spreads through the mechanism of “organized activist” variation and “everyday activist” selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Allen, P. (1970). Free space: A perspective on the small group in women's liberation [Times Change, New York]. In Kodet, A., Levine, E., and Rapone, A. (eds.), Radical Feminism, 1973, Quadrangle, NewYork, pp. 271–279 [abridged].

  • Babcock, L., and Loewenstein, R. (1997). Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases. J. Econ. Perspect. 11: 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benn, S. I., and Peters, R. S. (1959). The Principles of Political Thought, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (l955–1956). Equality. Proc. Aristotelian Soc. 56: 301–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. [1977] 1980. Powers and strategies. In Gordon, C. (ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, Pantheon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. ([1929–1935] 1971). In Hoare, Q., and Smith, G. (trans. and eds.), Selections From the Prison Notebooks, International, New York.

  • Groch, S. (2001). Free spaces: Creating oppositional consciousness in the disability rights movement. In Mansbridge, J. J., and Morris, A. (eds.), Oppositional Consciousness: The Subjective Roots of Social Protest, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. ([1981] 1986). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (McCarthy, T., trans.), Beacon, Boston.

  • Habermas, J. ([l962] 1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (Burger, T., and Lattimore, F., Trans.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

  • Jasper, J. M. (1997). The Art of Moral Protest, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. J. (1990). Beyond Self-Interest, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. J. (2001a). The making of oppositional consciousness. In Mansbridge, J. J., and Morris, A. (eds.), Oppositional Consciousness: The Subjective Roots of Social Protest, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. J. (2001b). Complicating oppositional consciousness. In Mansbridge, J. J., and Morris, A. (eds.), Oppositional Consciousness: The Subjective Roots of Social Protest, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. J. (forthcoming). Everyday Feminism, MS.

  • Mansbridge, J. J., and Flaster, K. (in press). “The cultural politics of everyday discourse: The case of ‘male chauvinist.”’ Crit. Soc. 32(2).

  • Mansbridge, J. J., and Morris, A. (2001). Oppositional Consciousness: The Subjective Roots of Social Protest, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., and Engels, F. ([l848] 1954). The Communist Manifesto, Regnery, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. [1859] (1974). On Liberty, Pelican, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A., and Braine, N. (2001). Social movements and oppositional consciousness. In Mansbridge, J. J., and Morris, A. (eds.), Oppositional Consciousness: The Subjective Roots of Social Protest, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A., and Sprague, J. (1986). Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (l971). A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn., Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (l990). Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. G. (1998). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teske, N. (1997). Political Activists in America: The Identity Construction Model of Political Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. P. (1966 [1963]). The Making of the English Working Class, Vintage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane Mansbridge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mansbridge, J. Cracking Through Hegemonic Ideology: The Logic of Formal Justice. Soc Just Res 18, 335–347 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-005-6828-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-005-6828-0

Keywords