Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion
- PMID: 11807554
- DOI: 10.1038/415429a
Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion
Abstract
When a person looks at an object while exploring it with their hand, vision and touch both provide information for estimating the properties of the object. Vision frequently dominates the integrated visual-haptic percept, for example when judging size, shape or position, but in some circumstances the percept is clearly affected by haptics. Here we propose that a general principle, which minimizes variance in the final estimate, determines the degree to which vision or haptics dominates. This principle is realized by using maximum-likelihood estimation to combine the inputs. To investigate cue combination quantitatively, we first measured the variances associated with visual and haptic estimation of height. We then used these measurements to construct a maximum-likelihood integrator. This model behaved very similarly to humans in a visual-haptic task. Thus, the nervous system seems to combine visual and haptic information in a fashion that is similar to a maximum-likelihood integrator. Visual dominance occurs when the variance associated with visual estimation is lower than that associated with haptic estimation.
Similar articles
-
Young children do not integrate visual and haptic form information.Curr Biol. 2008 May 6;18(9):694-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.036. Curr Biol. 2008. PMID: 18450446
-
Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention.J Vis. 2008 Jan 31;8(1):21.1-16. doi: 10.1167/8.1.21. J Vis. 2008. PMID: 18318624
-
Optimal visual-haptic integration with articulated tools.Exp Brain Res. 2017 May;235(5):1361-1373. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4896-5. Epub 2017 Feb 18. Exp Brain Res. 2017. PMID: 28214998 Free PMC article.
-
Haptic and Somesthetic Communication in Sexual Medicine.Sex Med Rev. 2021 Apr;9(2):267-279. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Jul 18. Sex Med Rev. 2021. PMID: 32690471 Review.
-
Assume a Spherical Chicken: Analytic Constraints, Inertia Tensor Information, and Wielded Rod Length Perception.J Mot Behav. 2019;51(6):698-714. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2019.1565527. Epub 2019 Feb 4. J Mot Behav. 2019. PMID: 30714509 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of the spatial congruence of redundant targets on within-modal and cross-modal integration.Exp Brain Res. 2013 Jan;224(2):275-85. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3308-0. Epub 2012 Nov 25. Exp Brain Res. 2013. PMID: 23183636
-
A Systematic Comparison of Perceptual Performance in Softness Discrimination with Different Fingers.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Oct;82(7):3696-3709. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02100-4. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020. PMID: 32686066 Free PMC article.
-
Non-informative vision improves spatial tactile discrimination on the shoulder but does not influence detection sensitivity.Exp Brain Res. 2020 Dec;238(12):2865-2875. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05944-2. Epub 2020 Oct 13. Exp Brain Res. 2020. PMID: 33051694 Free PMC article.
-
Transsaccadic perception is affected by saccade landing point deviations after saccadic adaptation.J Vis. 2020 Sep 2;20(9):8. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.9.8. J Vis. 2020. PMID: 32915955 Free PMC article.
-
Vision perceptually restores auditory spectral dynamics in speech.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 21;117(29):16920-16927. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2002887117. Epub 2020 Jul 6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020. PMID: 32632010 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
