Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009;39(3):235-56.
doi: 10.2165/00007256-200939030-00005.

Annual age-grouping and athlete development: a meta-analytical review of relative age effects in sport

Stephen Cobley  1 , Joseph Baker, Nick Wattie, Jim McKenna
Affiliations
Review

Annual age-grouping and athlete development: a meta-analytical review of relative age effects in sport

Stephen Cobley et al. Sports Med. 2009.

Abstract

Annual age-grouping is a common organizational strategy in sport. However, such a strategy appears to promote relative age effects (RAEs). RAEs refer both to the immediate participation and long-term attainment constraints in sport, occurring as a result of chronological age and associated physical (e.g. height) differences as well as selection practices in annual age-grouped cohorts. This article represents the first meta-analytical review of RAEs, aimed to collectively determine (i) the overall prevalence and strength of RAEs across and within sports, and (ii) identify moderator variables. A total of 38 studies, spanning 1984-2007, containing 253 independent samples across 14 sports and 16 countries were re-examined and included in a single analysis using odds ratios and random effects procedures for combining study estimates. Overall results identified consistent prevalence of RAEs, but with small effect sizes. Effect size increased linearly with relative age differences. Follow-up analyses identified age category, skill level and sport context as moderators of RAE magnitude. Sports context involving adolescent (aged 15-18 years) males, at the representative (i.e. regional and national) level in highly popular sports appear most at risk to RAE inequalities. Researchers need to understand the mechanisms by which RAEs magnify and subside, as well as confirm whether RAEs exist in female and more culturally diverse contexts. To reduce and eliminate this social inequality from influencing athletes' experiences, especially within developmental periods, direct policy, organizational and practitioner intervention is required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. J Sports Sci. 2001 Sep;19(9):677-86 - PubMed
    1. Sports Med. 1995 Aug;20(2):59-64 - PubMed
    1. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1994;22:389-433 - PubMed
    1. J Sports Sci. 2005 Jul;23(7):747-56 - PubMed
    1. J Sports Sci. 2005 Oct;23(10):1013-20 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources