Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov;4(6):709-725.
doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00192.x. Epub 2011 Jun 18.

Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspective

Andrew R Weeks, Carla M Sgro, Andrew G Young, Richard Frankham, Nicki J Mitchell, Kim A Miller, Margaret Byrne, David J Coates, Mark D B Eldridge, Paul Sunnucks, Martin F Breed, Elizabeth A James, Ary A Hoffmann

Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspective

Andrew R Weeks et al. Evol Appl. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Translocations are being increasingly proposed as a way of conserving biodiversity, particularly in the management of threatened and keystone species, with the aims of maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem function under the combined pressures of habitat fragmentation and climate change. Evolutionary genetic considerations should be an important part of translocation strategies, but there is often confusion about concepts and goals. Here, we provide a classification of translocations based on specific genetic goals for both threatened species and ecological restoration, separating targets based on 'genetic rescue' of current population fitness from those focused on maintaining adaptive potential. We then provide a framework for assessing the genetic benefits and risks associated with translocations and provide guidelines for managers focused on conserving biodiversity and evolutionary processes. Case studies are developed to illustrate the framework.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Genetic considerations in establishing populations outside the current or historical distribution of a species. Relevant scenarios depend particularly on whether levels of genetic variability in the populations are high or low, but also on the distribution of populations along the gradient.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Simplified decision tree for determining whether to proceed or assess risk in translocation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Allendorf FW. Isolation, gene flow, and genetic differentiation among populations. In: Schonewald-Cox CM, Chambers SM, MacBryde B, Thomas WL, editors. Genetics and Conservation: A Reference for Managing Wild Animal and Plant Populations. California: Menlo Park; 1983. pp. 51–65.
    1. Armstrong DP, Seddon P. Directions in reintroduction biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2008;23:20–25. - PubMed
    1. Arnold ML, Martin N. Hybrid fitness across time and habitats. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2010;25:530–536. - PubMed
    1. Atkins KE, Travis JM. Local adaptation and the evolution of species’ ranges under climate change. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2010;266:449–457. - PubMed
    1. Bailey J, Hendry A, Kinnison M, Post D, Palkovacs E, Pelletier F, Harmon L, et al. From genes to ecosystems: an emerging synthesis of eco-evolutionary dynamics. New Phytologist. 2009;184:743–745. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources