Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;1(1):33-60.
doi: 10.1016/j.jegh.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

Could influenza transmission be reduced by restricting mass gatherings? Towards an evidence-based policy framework

Affiliations

Could influenza transmission be reduced by restricting mass gatherings? Towards an evidence-based policy framework

David A Ishola et al. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Mass gatherings (MG) may provide ideal conditions for influenza transmission. The evidence for an association between MG and influenza transmission is reviewed to assess whether restricting MG may reduce transmission.

Methods: Major databases were searched (Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL), producing 1706 articles that were sifted by title, abstract, and full-text. A narrative approach was adopted for data synthesis.

Results: Twenty-four papers met the inclusion criteria, covering MG of varying sizes and settings, and including 9 observational studies, 10 outbreak reports, 4 event reports, and a quasi-experimental study. There is some evidence that certain types of MG may be associated with increased risk of influenza transmission. MG may also "seed" new strains into an area, and may instigate community transmission in a pandemic. Restricting MGs, in combination with other social distancing interventions, may help reduce transmission, but it was not possible to identify conclusive evidence on the individual effect of MG restriction alone. Evidence suggests that event duration and crowdedness may be the key factors that determine the risk of influenza transmission, and possibly the type of venue (indoor/outdoor).

Conclusion: These factors potentially represent a basis for a policy-making framework for MG restrictions in the event of a severe pandemic.

Keywords: Evidence; Influenza; Mass gathering; Policy; Transmission.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram of search strategy results and article selection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brankston G, Gitterman L, Hirji Z, Lemieux C, et al. Transmission of influenza A in human beings. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:257–65. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70029-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lemieux C, Brankston G, Gitterman L, Hirji Z, et al. Questioning aerosol transmission of influenza. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:173–74. doi: 10.3201/eid1301.061202. author reply 174–75. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tellier R. Aerosol transmission of influenza A virus: a review of new studies. J R Soc Interface. 2009;6(Suppl. 6):S783–790. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Michael JA, Barbera JA. Mass gathering medical care: a twenty-five year review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1997;12:305–12. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00037857. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Milsten AM, Maguire BJ, Bissell RA, Seaman KG. Mass-gathering medical care: a review of the literature. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2002;17:151–62. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00000388. - DOI - PubMed