Has industry funding biased studies of the protective effects of alcohol on cardiovascular disease? A preliminary investigation of prospective cohort studies
- PMID: 24602075
- PMCID: PMC4441279
- DOI: 10.1111/dar.12125
Has industry funding biased studies of the protective effects of alcohol on cardiovascular disease? A preliminary investigation of prospective cohort studies
Abstract
Introduction and aims: There have been no previous quantitative analyses of the possible effects of industry funding on alcohol and health research. This study examines whether findings of alcohol's protective effects on cardiovascular disease may be biased by industry funding.
Design and methods: Findings from a recent systematic review of prospective cohort studies were combined with public domain data on alcohol industry funding. The six outcomes evaluated were alcohol's effects on cardiovascular disease mortality, incident coronary heart disease, coronary heart disease mortality, incident stroke, stroke mortality and mortality from all causes.
Results: We find no evidence of possible funding effects for outcomes other than stroke. Whether studies find alcohol to be a risk factor or protective against incident stroke depends on whether or not there is possible industry funding [risk ratio (RR) 1.07 (0.97-1.17) for those without concern about industry funding compared with RR 0.88 (0.81-0.94)]. For stroke mortality, a similar difference is not statistically significant, most likely because there are too few studies.
Discussion and conclusions: Dedicated high-quality studies of possible alcohol industry funding effects should be undertaken, and these should be broad in scope. They also need to investigate specific areas of concern, such as stroke, in greater depth.
Keywords: alcohol; alcohol industry; bias; cardiovascular disease; health benefits.
© 2014 The Authors. Drug and Alcohol Review published by Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs .
Figures






Similar articles
-
Alcohol Researchers Should Not Accept Funding From the Alcohol Industry: Perspectives From Brief Interventions Research.J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016 Jul;77(4):537-40. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.537. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016. PMID: 27340951 No abstract available.
-
Alcohol, cardiovascular disease and industry funding: A co-authorship network analysis of systematic reviews.Soc Sci Med. 2021 Nov;289:114450. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114450. Epub 2021 Oct 1. Soc Sci Med. 2021. PMID: 34607052 Free PMC article.
-
Health experts reject industry-backed funding for alcohol research.Med J Aust. 2009 Jun 15;190(12):713; discussion 714. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02647.x. Med J Aust. 2009. PMID: 19527212 No abstract available.
-
Association of industry ties with outcomes of studies examining the effect of wholegrain foods on cardiovascular disease and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2019 May 19;9(5):e022912. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022912. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31110080 Free PMC article.
-
Association of alcohol consumption with selected cardiovascular disease outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ. 2011 Feb 22;342:d671. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d671. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21343207 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Declared funding and authorship by alcohol industry actors in the scientific literature: a bibliometric study.Eur J Public Health. 2020 Dec 11;30(6):1193-1200. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa172. Eur J Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32939544 Free PMC article.
-
The 'snowball effect': short and long-term consequences of early career alcohol industry research funding.Addict Res Theory. 2021 Jul 22;30(2):119-125. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2021.1952190. eCollection 2022. Addict Res Theory. 2021. PMID: 35299957 Free PMC article.
-
The alcohol industry, charities and policy influence in the UK.Eur J Public Health. 2014 Aug;24(4):557-61. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku076. Epub 2014 Jun 9. Eur J Public Health. 2014. PMID: 24913316 Free PMC article.
-
Weak evidence on nalmefene creates dilemmas for clinicians and poses questions for regulators and researchers.Addiction. 2016 Aug;111(8):1477-87. doi: 10.1111/add.13438. Epub 2016 Jun 5. Addiction. 2016. PMID: 27262594 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Alcohol Industry Involvement in the Moderate Alcohol and Cardiovascular Health Trial.Am J Public Health. 2020 Apr;110(4):485-488. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305508. Epub 2020 Feb 20. Am J Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32078349 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sellman D, Connor J, Robinson G, Jackson R. Alcohol cardio-protection has been talked up. N Z Med J. 2009;122:97–101. - PubMed
-
- Fillmore KM, Stockwell T, Chikritzhs T, Bostrom A, Kerr W. Moderate alcohol use and reduced mortality risk: systematic error in prospective studies and new hypotheses. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17:S16–23. - PubMed
-
- Fekjaer HO. Alcohol-a universal preventive agent? A critical analysis. Addiction. 2013;108:2051–2057. - PubMed
-
- Naimi TS, Xuan Z, Brown DW, Saitz R. Confounding and studies of ‘moderate’ alcohol consumption: the case of drinking frequency and implications for low-risk drinking guidelines. Addiction. 2013;108:1534–1543. - PubMed
-
- Fillmore KM, Kerr WC, Stockwell T, Chikritzhs T, Bostrom A. Moderate alcohol use and reduced mortality risk: systematic error in prospective studies. Addiction Research & Theory. 2006;14:101–132. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources