Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun;71(6):550-557.
doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-207890. Epub 2016 Dec 14.

Sex differences in the relationship between socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kathryn Backholer  1   2 , Sanne A E Peters  3 , Sophie H Bots  3 , Anna Peeters  1   2 , Rachel R Huxley  4 , Mark Woodward  3   5
Affiliations
Review

Sex differences in the relationship between socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kathryn Backholer et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Low socioeconomic status (SES) is a known risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) but whether its effects are comparable in women and men is unknown.

Methods: PubMed MEDLINE was systematically searched. Studies that reported sex-specific estimates, and associated variability, of the relative risk (RR) for coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke or CVD according to a marker of SES (education, occupation, income or area of residence), for women and men were included. RRs were combined with those derived from cohort studies using individual participant data. Data were pooled using random effects meta-analyses with inverse variance weighting. Estimates of the ratio of the RRs (RRR), comparing women with men, were computed.

Results: Data from 116 cohorts, over 22 million individuals, and over 1 million CVD events, suggest that lower SES is associated with increased risk of CHD, stroke and CVD in women and men. For CHD, there was a significantly greater excess risk associated with lower educational attainment in women compared with men; comparing lowest with highest levels, the age-adjusted RRR was 1.24 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.41) and the multiple-adjusted RRR was 1.34 (1.09 to 1.63). For stroke, the age-adjusted RRR was 0.93 (0.72 to 1.18), and the multiple-adjusted was RRR 0.79 (0.53 to 1.19). Corresponding results for CVD were 1.18 (1.03 to 1.36), 1.23 (1.03 to 1.48), respectively. Similar results were observed for other markers of SES for all three outcomes.

Conclusions: Reduction of socioeconomic inequalities in CHD and CVD outcomes might require different approaches for men and women.

Keywords: CORONARY HEART DISEASE; Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease; META ANALYSIS; SOCIAL INEQUALITIES; STROKE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

LinkOut - more resources