Hugs and kisses - The role of motor preferences and emotional lateralization for hemispheric asymmetries in human social touch
- PMID: 30339836
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.10.007
Hugs and kisses - The role of motor preferences and emotional lateralization for hemispheric asymmetries in human social touch
Abstract
Social touch is an important aspect of human social interaction - across all cultures, humans engage in kissing, cradling and embracing. These behaviors are necessarily asymmetric, but the factors that determine their lateralization are not well-understood. Because the hands are often involved in social touch, motor preferences may give rise to asymmetric behavior. However, social touch often occurs in emotional contexts, suggesting that biases might be modulated by asymmetries in emotional processing. Social touch may therefore provide unique insights into lateralized brain networks that link emotion and action. Here, we review the literature on lateralization of cradling, kissing and embracing with respect to motor and emotive bias theories. Lateral biases in all three forms of social touch are influenced, but not fully determined by handedness. Thus, motor bias theory partly explains side biases in social touch. However, emotional context also affects side biases, most strongly for embracing. Taken together, literature analysis reveals that side biases in social touch are most likely determined by a combination of motor and emotive biases.
Keywords: Cradling; Embracing; Emotion; Handedness; Hugging; Kissing; Laterality; Lateralization.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Asymmetries in social touch-motor and emotional biases on lateral preferences in embracing, cradling and kissing.Laterality. 2020 May;25(3):325-348. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2019.1690496. Epub 2019 Nov 18. Laterality. 2020. PMID: 31739761
-
Artistic turns: laterality in paintings of kisses and embraces.Laterality. 2024 Jul;29(4):396-415. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2024.2399352. Epub 2024 Sep 10. Laterality. 2024. PMID: 39257221
-
Functional lateralization in social-emotional processing: The influence of sexual orientation and gender identity on cradling preferences.Early Hum Dev. 2024 Jul;194:106049. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106049. Epub 2024 May 18. Early Hum Dev. 2024. PMID: 38781713
-
Handedness and sex effects on lateral biases in human cradling: Three meta-analyses.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Sep;104:30-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.035. Epub 2019 Jun 26. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019. PMID: 31254542 Review.
-
Handedness as a major determinant of lateral bias in human functional cradling.Infancy. 2024 Mar-Apr;29(2):84-94. doi: 10.1111/infa.12572. Epub 2023 Dec 15. Infancy. 2024. PMID: 38100601 Review.
Cited by
-
The Relationship Between the Left-Cradling Bias and Attachment to Parents and Partner.Evol Psychol. 2019 Apr-Jun;17(2):1474704919848117. doi: 10.1177/1474704919848117. Evol Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31122061 Free PMC article.
-
Opposite asymmetries of face and trunk and of kissing and hugging, as predicted by the axial twist hypothesis.PeerJ. 2019 Jun 7;7:e7096. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7096. eCollection 2019. PeerJ. 2019. PMID: 31211022 Free PMC article.
-
Human Lateralization, Maternal Effects and Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Mar 22;15:668520. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.668520. eCollection 2021. Front Behav Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 33828467 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Blindness on Spatial Asymmetries.Brain Sci. 2020 Sep 23;10(10):662. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10100662. Brain Sci. 2020. PMID: 32977398 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A systematic review and multivariate meta-analysis of the physical and mental health benefits of touch interventions.Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Jun;8(6):1088-1107. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01841-8. Epub 2024 Apr 8. Nat Hum Behav. 2024. PMID: 38589702 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources