Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;98(1):39-56.
doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12437. Epub 2019 Dec 5.

Is Moderate Drinking Protective Against Heart Disease? The Science, Politics and History of a Public Health Conundrum

Gerald M Oppenheimer  1   2 , Ronald Bayer  1
Affiliations

Is Moderate Drinking Protective Against Heart Disease? The Science, Politics and History of a Public Health Conundrum

Gerald M Oppenheimer et al. Milbank Q. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Policy Points For more than 40 years, most research by epidemiologists, social scientists, and alcohol policy experts found that moderate alcohol consumption was cardioprotective. In the early 2000s, that consensus was shaken by new critics who subjected the previous research to vigorous methodological and empirical analysis, precipitating a bitter controversy, seemingly unresolvable despite numerous observational epidemiological studies. The effort to finally put that debate to rest through a large, multiyear randomized controlled trial under the aegis of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, generated external criticism and adverse newspaper coverage, particularly because the trial was largely funded by the alcohol industry, forcing National Institutes of Health leadership to abruptly terminate the study shortly after it started. In the absence of definitive evidence and given the contentious debate over the risks and benefits of moderate alcohol consumption, those who formulate health policy have a responsibility to clearly acknowledge to the public the existence of evidentiary uncertainty when making recommendations.

Keywords: Alcohol; alcohol policy; coronary heart disease; epidemiology; primary prevention; public health; randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Rabin R. Is alcohol good for you? An industry‐backed study seeks answers. New York Times July 3, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/03/well/eat/alcohol-national-institutes-.... Accessed November 26, 2019.
    1. Rabin R. Federal agency courted alcohol industry to fund study on benefits of moderate drinking. New York Times March 1, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/17/health/nih-alcohol-study-liquor-indus.... Accessed September 19, 2019.
    1. Siegel M. NIH disbands alcohol clinical trial because of scientific and ethical breaches, the rest of the story: tobacco and alcohol new analysis and commentary. Blog post. June 16, 2018. http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com. Accessed January 29, 2019.
    1. Public Citizen. NIH officials may have violated policy by soliciting donations from alcohol industry for alcohol study. March 19, 2018. https://www.citizen.org/media/press-releases/nih-officials-may-have-viol.... Accessed September 19, 2019.
    1. Rabin R. It was supposed to be an unbiased study of drinking. They wanted to call it “Cheers.” New York Times June 18, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/18/health/nih-alcohol-study.html. Accessed November 26, 2019.

MeSH terms