How to improve adherence with quarantine: rapid review of the evidence
- PMID: 32334182
- PMCID: PMC7194967
- DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.03.007
How to improve adherence with quarantine: rapid review of the evidence
Abstract
Objectives: The December 2019 outbreak of coronavirus has once again thrown the vexed issue of quarantine into the spotlight, with many countries asking their citizens to 'self-isolate' if they have potentially come into contact with the infection. However, adhering to quarantine is difficult. Decisions on how to apply quarantine should be based on the best available evidence to increase the likelihood of people adhering to protocols. We conducted a rapid review to identify factors associated with adherence to quarantine during infectious disease outbreaks.
Study design: The study design is a rapid evidence review.
Methods: We searched Medline, PsycINFO and Web of Science for published literature on the reasons for and factors associated with adherence to quarantine during an infectious disease outbreak.
Results: We found 3163 articles and included 14 in the review. Adherence to quarantine ranged from as little as 0 up to 92.8%. The main factors which influenced or were associated with adherence decisions were the knowledge people had about the disease and quarantine procedure, social norms, perceived benefits of quarantine and perceived risk of the disease, as well as practical issues such as running out of supplies or the financial consequences of being out of work.
Conclusions: People vary in their adherence to quarantine during infectious disease outbreaks. To improve this, public health officials should provide a timely, clear rationale for quarantine and information about protocols; emphasise social norms to encourage this altruistic behaviour; increase the perceived benefit that engaging in quarantine will have on public health; and ensure that sufficient supplies of food, medication and other essentials are provided.
Keywords: Adherence; Compliance; Infectious disease outbreak; Quarantine.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Attitudes and opinions on quarantine and support for a contact-tracing application in France during the COVID-19 outbreak.Public Health. 2020 Nov;188:21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.08.026. Epub 2020 Oct 12. Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33059232 Free PMC article.
-
The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence.Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8. Epub 2020 Feb 26. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32112714 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Social consequences of mass quarantine during epidemics: a systematic review with implications for the COVID-19 response.J Travel Med. 2020 Nov 9;27(7):taaa192. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa192. J Travel Med. 2020. PMID: 33051660 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators of adherence to social distancing recommendations during COVID-19 among a large international sample of adults.PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239795. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33027281 Free PMC article.
-
Income assurances are a crucial factor in determining public compliance with self-isolation regulations during the COVID-19 outbreak - cohort study in Israel.Isr J Health Policy Res. 2020 Oct 20;9(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13584-020-00418-w. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2020. PMID: 33081833 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Attitudes and opinions on quarantine and support for a contact-tracing application in France during the COVID-19 outbreak.Public Health. 2020 Nov;188:21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.08.026. Epub 2020 Oct 12. Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33059232 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of the non-pharmaceutical public health interventions against COVID-19; a protocol of a systematic review and realist review.PLoS One. 2020 Sep 29;15(9):e0239554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239554. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. Update in: PLoS One. 2021 Nov 23;16(11):e0260371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260371. PMID: 32991604 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Double standards in the COVID-19 pandemic: The moderation of perceived threat.Eur J Soc Psychol. 2022 Apr;52(3):515-527. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2834. Epub 2022 May 19. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35463056 Free PMC article.
-
Antibiotic Resistance Awareness among Undergraduate Students in Quito, Ecuador.Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Feb 3;11(2):197. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11020197. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35203800 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 and Bangladesh: Challenges and How to Address Them.Front Public Health. 2020 Apr 30;8:154. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00154. eCollection 2020. Front Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32426318 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . 2017. Quarantine and isolation.https://www.cdc.gov/quarantine/index.html Available from:
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources