Automated and partly automated contact tracing: a systematic review to inform the control of COVID-19
- PMID: 32839755
- PMCID: PMC7438082
- DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30184-9
Automated and partly automated contact tracing: a systematic review to inform the control of COVID-19
Abstract
Evidence for the use of automated or partly automated contact-tracing tools to contain severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is scarce. We did a systematic review of automated or partly automated contact tracing. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, OVID Global Health, EBSCO Medical COVID Information Portal, Cochrane Library, medRxiv, bioRxiv, arXiv, and Google Advanced for articles relevant to COVID-19, severe acute respiratory syndrome, Middle East respiratory syndrome, influenza, or Ebola virus, published from Jan 1, 2000, to April 14, 2020. We also included studies identified through professional networks up to April 30, 2020. We reviewed all full-text manuscripts. Primary outcomes were the number or proportion of contacts (or subsequent cases) identified. Secondary outcomes were indicators of outbreak control, uptake, resource use, cost-effectiveness, and lessons learnt. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020179822). Of the 4036 studies identified, 110 full-text studies were reviewed and 15 studies were included in the final analysis and quality assessment. No empirical evidence of the effectiveness of automated contact tracing (regarding contacts identified or transmission reduction) was identified. Four of seven included modelling studies that suggested that controlling COVID-19 requires a high population uptake of automated contact-tracing apps (estimates from 56% to 95%), typically alongside other control measures. Studies of partly automated contact tracing generally reported more complete contact identification and follow-up compared with manual systems. Automated contact tracing could potentially reduce transmission with sufficient population uptake. However, concerns regarding privacy and equity should be considered. Well designed prospective studies are needed given gaps in evidence of effectiveness, and to investigate the integration and relative effects of manual and automated systems. Large-scale manual contact tracing is therefore still key in most contexts.
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013699. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013699. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33502000 Free PMC article.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Citizen-Centered Mobile Health Apps Collecting Individual-Level Spatial Data for Infectious Disease Management: Scoping Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 10;8(11):e22594. doi: 10.2196/22594. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 33074833 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of contact tracing in the control of infectious diseases: a systematic review.Lancet Public Health. 2022 Mar;7(3):e259-e273. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00001-9. Epub 2022 Feb 16. Lancet Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35180434 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative effectiveness of contact tracing interventions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;38(3):243-266. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-00963-z. Epub 2023 Feb 16. Eur J Epidemiol. 2023. PMID: 36795349 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Improving COVID-19 contact tracing and testing of exposed individuals in Cameroon using digital health technology: a cluster randomised trial.EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Jul 13;74:102730. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102730. eCollection 2024 Aug. EClinicalMedicine. 2024. PMID: 39109192 Free PMC article.
-
Automated vs. manual case investigation and contact tracing for pandemic surveillance: Evidence from a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Nov 12;55:101726. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101726. eCollection 2023 Jan. EClinicalMedicine. 2022. PMID: 36386031 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the scope and utility of digital proximity tracing in the effective containment of COVID-19 infection: A narrative review.Germs. 2022 Jun 30;12(2):276-282. doi: 10.18683/germs.2022.1329. eCollection 2022 Jun. Germs. 2022. PMID: 36504605 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Trading contact tracing efficiency for finding patient zero.Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 30;12(1):22582. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26892-7. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36585429 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 Contact Tracing Using Blockchain.IEEE Access. 2021 Apr 21;9:62956-62971. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3074753. eCollection 2021. IEEE Access. 2021. PMID: 34812392 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hale T, Webster S, Petherick A, Phillips T, Kira B. Blavatnik School of Government; Oxford: 2020. Oxford COVID-19 government response tracker.https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/research-projects/coronavirus-governme... - PubMed
-
- Flaxman S, Mishra S, Gandy A. Estimating the number of infections and the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in European countries: technical description update. ArXiv. 2020 https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.11342 published online April 23. (preprint)
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous