Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;2(11):e607-e621.
doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30184-9. Epub 2020 Aug 19.

Automated and partly automated contact tracing: a systematic review to inform the control of COVID-19

Affiliations

Automated and partly automated contact tracing: a systematic review to inform the control of COVID-19

Isobel Braithwaite et al. Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Evidence for the use of automated or partly automated contact-tracing tools to contain severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is scarce. We did a systematic review of automated or partly automated contact tracing. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, OVID Global Health, EBSCO Medical COVID Information Portal, Cochrane Library, medRxiv, bioRxiv, arXiv, and Google Advanced for articles relevant to COVID-19, severe acute respiratory syndrome, Middle East respiratory syndrome, influenza, or Ebola virus, published from Jan 1, 2000, to April 14, 2020. We also included studies identified through professional networks up to April 30, 2020. We reviewed all full-text manuscripts. Primary outcomes were the number or proportion of contacts (or subsequent cases) identified. Secondary outcomes were indicators of outbreak control, uptake, resource use, cost-effectiveness, and lessons learnt. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020179822). Of the 4036 studies identified, 110 full-text studies were reviewed and 15 studies were included in the final analysis and quality assessment. No empirical evidence of the effectiveness of automated contact tracing (regarding contacts identified or transmission reduction) was identified. Four of seven included modelling studies that suggested that controlling COVID-19 requires a high population uptake of automated contact-tracing apps (estimates from 56% to 95%), typically alongside other control measures. Studies of partly automated contact tracing generally reported more complete contact identification and follow-up compared with manual systems. Automated contact tracing could potentially reduce transmission with sufficient population uptake. However, concerns regarding privacy and equity should be considered. Well designed prospective studies are needed given gaps in evidence of effectiveness, and to investigate the integration and relative effects of manual and automated systems. Large-scale manual contact tracing is therefore still key in most contexts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hale T, Webster S, Petherick A, Phillips T, Kira B. Blavatnik School of Government; Oxford: 2020. Oxford COVID-19 government response tracker.https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/research-projects/coronavirus-governme... - PubMed
    1. Flaxman S, Mishra S, Gandy A. Estimating the number of infections and the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in European countries: technical description update. ArXiv. 2020 https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.11342 published online April 23. (preprint)
    1. Kraemer MUG, Yang C-H, Gutierrez B. The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science. 2020;368:493–497. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Douglas M, Katikireddi SV, Taulbut M, McKee M, McCartney G. Mitigating the wider health effects of covid-19 pandemic response. BMJ. 2020;369 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bedford J, Enria D, Giesecke J. COVID-19: towards controlling of a pandemic. Lancet. 2020;395:1015–1018. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types