Facilitators and barriers to engagement with contact tracing during infectious disease outbreaks: A rapid review of the evidence
- PMID: 33120402
- PMCID: PMC7595276
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241473
Facilitators and barriers to engagement with contact tracing during infectious disease outbreaks: A rapid review of the evidence
Abstract
Background: Until a vaccine is developed, a test, trace and isolate strategy is the most effective method of controlling the COVID-19 outbreak. Contact tracing and case isolation are common methods for controlling infectious disease outbreaks. However, the effectiveness of any contact tracing system rests on public engagement. Numerous factors may influence an individual's willingness to engage with a contact tracing system. Understanding these factors has become urgent during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Objective: To identify facilitators and barriers to uptake of, and engagement with, contact tracing during infectious disease outbreaks.
Method: A rapid systematic review was conducted to identify papers based on primary research, written in English, and that assessed facilitators, barriers, and other factors associated with the uptake of, and engagement with, a contact tracing system.
Principal findings: Four themes were identified as facilitators to the uptake of, and engagement with, contact tracing: collective responsibility; personal benefit; co-production of contact tracing systems; and the perception of the system as efficient, rigorous and reliable. Five themes were identified as barriers to the uptake of, and engagement with, contact tracing: privacy concerns; mistrust and/or apprehension; unmet need for more information and support; fear of stigmatization; and mode-specific challenges.
Conclusions: By focusing on the factors that have been identified, contact tracing services are more likely to get people to engage with them, identify more potentially ill contacts, and reduce transmission.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts.Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Apr;8(4):e488-e496. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30074-7. Epub 2020 Feb 28. Lancet Glob Health. 2020. PMID: 32119825 Free PMC article.
-
Peer-to-Peer Contact Tracing: Development of a Privacy-Preserving Smartphone App.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 7;8(4):e18936. doi: 10.2196/18936. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 32240973 Free PMC article.
-
Determining the optimal strategy for reopening schools, the impact of test and trace interventions, and the risk of occurrence of a second COVID-19 epidemic wave in the UK: a modelling study.Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Nov;4(11):817-827. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30250-9. Epub 2020 Aug 3. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020. PMID: 32758453 Free PMC article.
-
What Factors Influence Symptom Reporting and Access to Healthcare During an Emerging Infectious Disease Outbreak? A Rapid Review of the Evidence.Health Secur. 2021 Jul-Aug;19(4):353-363. doi: 10.1089/hs.2020.0126. Epub 2021 Jan 8. Health Secur. 2021. PMID: 33416425 Free PMC article.
-
A Framework for Sustainable Contact Tracing and Exposure Investigation for Large Health Systems.Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Jul;95(7):1432-1444. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 Jun 16. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020. PMID: 32561146 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Public Perception of the Use of Digital Contact-Tracing Tools After the COVID-19 Lockdown: Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining.JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 4;6(3):e33314. doi: 10.2196/33314. JMIR Form Res. 2022. PMID: 35120017 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding racial differences in attitudes about public health efforts during COVID-19 using an explanatory mixed methods design.Soc Sci Med. 2021 Oct;287:114379. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114379. Epub 2021 Sep 8. Soc Sci Med. 2021. PMID: 34520940 Free PMC article.
-
The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic.Lancet. 2022 Oct 8;400(10359):1224-1280. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01585-9. Epub 2022 Sep 14. Lancet. 2022. PMID: 36115368 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Contact Tracing: Barriers and Facilitators.Am J Public Health. 2022 Jul;112(7):1025-1033. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306842. Epub 2022 Jun 2. Am J Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35653650 Free PMC article.
-
Use of clinical data to augment healthcare worker contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Dec 28;29(1):142-148. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab231. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021. PMID: 34623426 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): situation report– 196. 3 August 2020. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situatio...
-
- Keeling MJ, Hollingsworth TD, Read JM. The efficacy of contact tracing for the containment of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). MedRxiv [preprint]. 2020 medRxiv 20023036 [posted 2020 February 17]. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.14.20023036v1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Baraniuk C. Covid-19 contact tracing: a briefing. BMJ. 2020. May 13;369. - PubMed
-
- Kucharski AJ, Klepac P, Conlan A, Kissler SM, Tang M, Fry H, et al. Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings. Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2020; 10: P1151–1160. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30457-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Carter P, Megnin-Viggars O, Rubin GJ. What factors influence symptom reporting during an emerging infectious disease outbreak? A rapid review of the evidence. MedRxiv [preprint]. 2020 medRxiv 20159897 [posted 2020 July 24]. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.23.20159897v1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources