Best Practice Guidance for Digital Contact Tracing Apps: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature
- PMID: 34003764
- PMCID: PMC8189288
- DOI: 10.2196/27753
Best Practice Guidance for Digital Contact Tracing Apps: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature
Abstract
Background: Digital contact tracing apps have the potential to augment contact tracing systems and disrupt COVID-19 transmission by rapidly identifying secondary cases prior to the onset of infectiousness and linking them into a system of quarantine, testing, and health care worker case management. The international experience of digital contact tracing apps during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates how challenging their design and deployment are.
Objective: This study aims to derive and summarize best practice guidance for the design of the ideal digital contact tracing app.
Methods: A collaborative cross-disciplinary approach was used to derive best practice guidance for designing the ideal digital contact tracing app. A search of the indexed and gray literature was conducted to identify articles describing or evaluating digital contact tracing apps. MEDLINE was searched using a combination of free-text terms and Medical Subject Headings search terms. Gray literature sources searched were the World Health Organization Institutional Repository for Information Sharing, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control publications library, and Google, including the websites of many health protection authorities. Articles that were acceptable for inclusion in this evidence synthesis were peer-reviewed publications, cohort studies, randomized trials, modeling studies, technical reports, white papers, and media reports related to digital contact tracing.
Results: Ethical, user experience, privacy and data protection, technical, clinical and societal, and evaluation considerations were identified from the literature. The ideal digital contact tracing app should be voluntary and should be equitably available and accessible. User engagement could be enhanced by small financial incentives, enabling users to tailor aspects of the app to their particular needs and integrating digital contact tracing apps into the wider public health information campaign. Adherence to the principles of good data protection and privacy by design is important to convince target populations to download and use digital contact tracing apps. Bluetooth Low Energy is recommended for a digital contact tracing app's contact event detection, but combining it with ultrasound technology may improve a digital contact tracing app's accuracy. A decentralized privacy-preserving protocol should be followed to enable digital contact tracing app users to exchange and record temporary contact numbers during contact events. The ideal digital contact tracing app should define and risk-stratify contact events according to proximity, duration of contact, and the infectiousness of the case at the time of contact. Evaluating digital contact tracing apps requires data to quantify app downloads, use among COVID-19 cases, successful contact alert generation, contact alert receivers, contact alert receivers that adhere to quarantine and testing recommendations, and the number of contact alert receivers who subsequently are tested positive for COVID-19. The outcomes of digital contact tracing apps' evaluations should be openly reported to allow for the wider public to review the evaluation of the app.
Conclusions: In conclusion, key considerations and best practice guidance for the design of the ideal digital contact tracing app were derived from the literature.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; app; automated contact tracing; best practice; design; digital contact tracing; mHealth; mobile app; monitoring; review; surveillance; tracing.
©James O'Connell, Manzar Abbas, Sarah Beecham, Jim Buckley, Muslim Chochlov, Brian Fitzgerald, Liam Glynn, Kevin Johnson, John Laffey, Bairbre McNicholas, Bashar Nuseibeh, Michael O'Callaghan, Ian O'Keeffe, Abdul Razzaq, Kaavya Rekanar, Ita Richardson, Andrew Simpkin, Cristiano Storni, Damyanka Tsvyatkova, Jane Walsh, Thomas Welsh, Derek O'Keeffe. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 07.06.2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
State of the Art in Adoption of Contact Tracing Apps and Recommendations Regarding Privacy Protection and Public Health: Systematic Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 10;9(6):e23250. doi: 10.2196/23250. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021. PMID: 34033581 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quality and Adoption of COVID-19 Tracing Apps and Recommendations for Development: Systematic Interdisciplinary Review of European Apps.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 2;23(6):e27989. doi: 10.2196/27989. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33890867 Free PMC article.
-
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33493125 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of the Swiss Digital Contact-Tracing App Over Various SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Waves: Repeated Cross-sectional Analyses.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Nov 11;8(11):e41004. doi: 10.2196/41004. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022. PMID: 36219833 Free PMC article.
-
Citizen-Centered Mobile Health Apps Collecting Individual-Level Spatial Data for Infectious Disease Management: Scoping Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 10;8(11):e22594. doi: 10.2196/22594. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 33074833 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Implementation of a Hardware-Assisted Bluetooth-Based COVID-19 Tracking Device in a High School: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 7;7:e39765. doi: 10.2196/39765. JMIR Form Res. 2023. PMID: 36525333 Free PMC article.
-
What Went Wrong with the IMMUNI Contact-Tracing App in Italy? A Cross-Sectional Survey on the Attitudes and Experiences among Healthcare University Students.Life (Basel). 2022 Jun 10;12(6):871. doi: 10.3390/life12060871. Life (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35743902 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of Contact Tracing Technologies for Infection Prevention and Control Purposes in Nosocomial Settings: A Systematic Literature Review.Infect Dis Rep. 2024 Jun 7;16(3):519-530. doi: 10.3390/idr16030039. Infect Dis Rep. 2024. PMID: 38920895 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Appraisal of a Contact Tracing Training Program for COVID-19 in Greece Focusing on Vulnerable Populations.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 2;18(17):9257. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179257. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34501844 Free PMC article.
-
Digital Healthcare Innovative Services in Times of Crisis: A Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 12;13(8):889. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080889. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40281838 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Timeline: WHO's COVID-19 response. World Health Organization. [2020-09-26]. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interact....
-
- WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. World Health Organization. [2021-05-28]. https://covid19.who.int/
-
- Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) World Health Organization. [2020-09-26]. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/question....
-
- Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): situation report, 46. World Health Organization. 2020. [2021-03-17]. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331443.
-
- Critical preparedness, readiness and response actions for COVID-19: interim guidance. World Health Organization. 2020. Jun 24, [2020-09-26]. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332665.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous