Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 28:13:e59918.
doi: 10.2196/59918.

Implementation and Impact of Intimate Partner Violence Screening Expansion in the Veterans Health Administration: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Evaluation

Affiliations

Implementation and Impact of Intimate Partner Violence Screening Expansion in the Veterans Health Administration: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Evaluation

Galina A Portnoy et al. JMIR Res Protoc. .

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health problem with far-reaching consequences. The health care system plays an integral role in the detection of and response to IPV. Historically, the majority of IPV screening initiatives have targeted women of reproductive age, with little known about men's IPV screening experiences or the impact of screening on men's health care. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has called for an expansion of IPV screening, providing a unique opportunity for a large-scale evaluation of IPV screening and response across all patient populations.

Objective: In this protocol paper, we describe the recently funded Partnered Evaluation of Relationship Health Innovations and Services through Mixed Methods (PRISM) initiative, aiming to evaluate the implementation and impact of the VHA's IPV screening and response expansion, with a particular focus on identifying potential gender differences.

Methods: The PRISM Initiative is guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0) frameworks. We will use mixed methods data from 139 VHA facilities to evaluate the IPV screening expansion, including electronic health record data and qualitative interviews with patients, clinicians, and national IPV program leadership. Quantitative data will be analyzed using a longitudinal observational design with repeated measurement periods at baseline (T0), year 1 (T1), and year 2 (T2). Qualitative interviews will focus on identifying multilevel factors, including potential implementation barriers and facilitators critical to IPV screening and response expansion, and examining the impact of screening on patients and clinicians.

Results: The PRISM initiative was funded in October 2023. We have developed the qualitative interview guides, obtained institutional review board approval, extracted quantitative data for baseline analyses, and began recruitment for qualitative interviews. Reports of progress and results will be made available to evaluation partners and funders through quarterly and end-of-year reports. All data collection and analyses across time points are expected to be completed in June 2026.

Conclusions: Findings from this mixed methods evaluation will provide a comprehensive understanding of IPV screening expansion at the VHA, including the implementation and impact of screening and the scope of IPV detected in the VHA patient population. Moreover, data generated by this initiative have critical policy and clinical practice implications in a national health care system.

International registered report identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/59918.

Keywords: evaluation; health care; implementation; intimate partner violence; national rollout; quality improvement; screening; veterans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

References

    1. Dichter ME, Cerulli C, Bossarte RM. Intimate partner violence victimization among women veterans and associated heart health risks. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21(4 Suppl):S190–S194. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.04.008.S1049-3867(11)00093-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA: 2015. [2019-04-09]. Intimate partner violence surveillance: uniform definitions and recommended data elements. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/ipv/intimatepartnerviolence.pdf .
    1. Portnoy GA, Rodriguez A, Kroll-Desrosiers A, Kessner MA, Walls S, Parkes DJ, Bruce LE, Estabrooks EA, Yano E. Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) among Veterans: A Secondary Analysis Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Veteran's Affairs [unpublished report]; 2022.
    1. Cowlishaw S, Freijah I, Kartal D, Sbisa A, Mulligan A, Notarianni M, Couineau A, Forbes D, O'Donnell M, Phelps A, Iverson KM, Heber A, O'Dwyer Carol, Smith P, Hosseiny F. Intimate partner violence (IPV) in military and veteran populations: a systematic review of population-based surveys and population screening studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(14):8853. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148853. https://www.mdpi.com/resolver?pii=ijerph19148853 ijerph19148853 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iverson KM, Livingston WS, Vogt D, Smith BN, Kehle-Forbes SM, Mitchell KS. Prevalence of sexual violence and intimate partner violence among US military veterans: findings from surveys with two national samples. J Gen Intern Med. 2024;39(3):418–427. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08486-9. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/38010460 10.1007/s11606-023-08486-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources