The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20071116130246/http://www.multichannel.com:80/article/CA6393309.html
Login��|��Register����������Free Newsletter Subscription
STORY TOOLS

NFL Network Is Still Plugging Holes


  • Talkback
  • Voices
  • Photos

Linda Moss
Linda Moss

November, 15 2007
Writers Hang Media Bigwigs With Their Own Words
Unfortunately for the nation�s media titans, striking TV writers have a lot of free time on th...
More

Tom Umstead
Tom Umstead

November, 12 2007
Is The Strike the Write Stuff for the Web?
One week into the television writers' strike and already some people are calling it the death knell ...
More

Tom Steinert-Threlkeld
Tom Steinert-Threlkeld

November, 10 2007
The FCC Figures
Bill Clinton openly questioned what the meaning of the word �is� is. Kevin Martin now wi...
More

Linda Haugsted
Linda Haugsted

November, 9 2007
Notes from the Writer’s strike, Western Division
The center of the Hollywood writing universe Friday morning was an white Enterprise stake-bed truck ...
More

Wall Street Picket Line
Writers Guild of America East members picket on Wall Street Tuesday, Nov. 13.
Strike Photos
Photos from Writers Guild of America rallies in Los Angeles and New York.
Freeze Frame
Photos from industry events, parties and meetings.

� VIEW ALL GALLERIES

Advertisement

NEWSLETTERS

Click on a title below to learn more.
Multichannel Newswire
MCN HD Update
MCN Telco IP Update
MCN Local Cable Advertising Sales
MCN Hispanic Television Update
MCN International Update
MCN HD Programming

Several Major Cablers Still Haven’t Signed for Eight-Game Package

By R. Thomas Umstead -- Multichannel News, 11/20/2006

Sidebars:
Might NFL Network Be Offsides On Antitrust?

Pigskin fans in markets served by Time Warner Cable, Cablevision Systems, Insight Communications and Charter Communications will most likely have to skip Thanksgiving dessert and head to a neighborhood watering hole if they want to watch the Denver Broncos against the Kansas City Chiefs on the NFL Network.

The National Football League’s television network and the four cable operators dug their cleats in the turf last week over distribution fees for the channel and its package of eight primetime games on Thursday and Saturday nights. The league-owned network is asking for a monthly license fee of 70 cents a subscriber for its service, up from 20 cents before the eight games became part of its roster.

Last January, Comcast, according to executives familiar with the negotiations, bid $2.4 billion over six seasons and offered an equity stake in the network now known as Versus for the package, before the league awarded the rights to its in-house channel.

Since that point, the NFL Network has been fighting to get wide, basic distribution before its season, in effect, kicks off on Thanksgiving Day.

But operators have been blocking that bid. As of press time last Friday — just five days before the NFL Network’s first live game — here’s a scorecard of the holes that opened up in the service’s distribution lineup:

Time Warner Cable: Will not carry the first game. Executive vice president of programming Fred Dressler said last Wednesday at the SportsBusiness Journal Sports Media & Technology summit in New York that it’s “100%” assured that the cable operator will not come to terms with the network before its primetime package kicks off on Nov. 23. Time Warner has steadfastly held the line and wants to offer the NFL Network on its low-penetrated sports tier, while the NFL Network continues to seeking analog basic distribution.

“It comes down to whether consumers will be allowed to pay for it discretely or whether it will be bundled into basic,” he added.

Cox Communications: Will carry games, but not on the basic tier. Senior vice president Bob Wilson, who also spoke at the conference, confirmed that the operator will offer NFL Network and its live games on its sports and information tier. He said that tier has about 30% penetration across all Cox subscribers and 60% penetration among Cox digital-cable homes.

Wilson would not reveal specifics about the agreement, but executives involved in NFL Network-cable operator negotiations said Cox and other distributors of the live game package are paying a surcharge for the games that’s more than double the approximately 20-cent license fee for the rest of the network’s programming.

Charter Communications: Off-air. The first cable operator to sign up with and carry the NFL Network in 2004 is in litigation with the service over the terms of that initial carriage deal. The network pulled its signal from Charter in December 2005 and filed a breach of contract suit against the operator in New York Supreme Court over contract language regarding distribution.

Executives at Charter — whose chairman, Paul Allen, owns the defending National Football Conference champion Seattle Seahawks — would only confirm that it is engaged in litigation with the network and plans to file a counterclaim. In August, the parties met with a mediator but were unsuccessful in efforts to work out their differences, according to Charter.

Insight Communications: Will not carry the games. Insight, which carries the NFL Network on its digital basic tier, has decided not to pay the additional surcharge to carry the game package. Representatives from Insight did not return phone calls by press time.

Cablevision Systems: Not likely to carry the first game. The operator doesn’t have a deal with the NFL Network and declined to comment on the matter.

Comcast: Will carry the eight games on its Digital Plus tier and sports tier in systems that already have the NFL Network, according to a spokeswoman. That does not include the recently acquired Adelphia and Time Warner Cable systems it picked up earlier this year.

Last week, though, the NFL disclosed that it filed suit in October in a New York State court to block Comcast from distributing NFL Network exclusively on a sports tier the nation’s largest cable operator plans to launch sometime in 2007. The disclosure about the suit, which remains sealed, came during a hearing in Washington, D.C., focusing on the distribution of its “NFL Sunday Ticket” out-of-market game package.

NFL Network president Steve Bornstein said during a network conference call last week that he was “not optimistic” that deals with Time Warner and other recalcitrant operators would be completed by Thanksgiving. He said the network will distribute the games to a little over 40 million subscribers.

“I’m always looking at the glass as half-full,” Bornstein said, adding that the network has 160 other cable distributors currently on board. “I believe I am offering a real good value to cable distributors … we are just hopeful that we can get 100% [distribution].”

�

Might NFL Network Be Offsides On Antitrust?

Washington — A Senate panel zeroed in not just on the National Football League’s efforts to gain distribution on cable for its NFL Network and for out-of-market games on satellite through its “NFL Sunday Ticket” out-of-market package, but also on legal protections that allow professional sports leagues to negotiate national TV contracts on behalf of their member teams.

Under the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961, Congress gave major sports leagues an exemption from antitrust law that otherwise would stop leagues from pooling the interests of their teams in order to execute contracts for the broadcasts of games. Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, citing a federal court case, said the 1961 law did not exempt the major leagues in their bargaining with pay-TV providers.

Stanford University economist Roger Noll, testifying before Specter’s panel, said he’s taught the SBA to students for 40 years “because it illustrates everything that could possibly go wrong with legislative antitrust exemptions.”

Noll, who urged Congress to sunset the SBA, said that without an antitrust exemption, sports teams could form groups or consortia that sold TV rights. After the hearing, he told a reporter the NFL could not offer NFL Sunday Ticket without the SBA exemption.

Although he hadn’t given NFL Network’s legal position a close review, Noll said it was his hunch that the network’s distribution of NFL games was an antitrust violation.

“The NFL Network is a profit enhancing reduction in output in the sense that … the eight games will be available to fewer people than had those games been offered on broadcast television,” Noll said.

Jeffery Pash, executive vice president and general counsel of the NFL, disputed Noll’s analysis.

“We are trying to develop the NFL Network. We are trying to build that as a new entrant into the television world,” said Pash, who also claimed that exclusive distribution of Sunday Ticket by DirecTV was pro-competitive.

The NFL wouldn’t sell the eight-game package to cable because cable operators refused to broadcast the games on free TV in the home markets of two teams on the field. “They wanted to have it exclusively on cable,” said Pash.

Specter pressed Pash on whether former NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue told Comcast that it couldn’t bid on NFL Sunday Ticket. Although Pash didn’t know the answer, he said the NFL had sound justification for keeping Sunday Ticket away from cable.

If Sunday Ticket were in “80 or 90 million cable households,” it “would cannibalize or undermine broadcast television,” Pash said. “We don’t want to have Sunday Ticket undermine or substitute for that.”

Ted Hearn



Advertisements




�2007 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites