Advertisement
Subscribe to Justia's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court opinions.
Subscribe NowThird Circuit Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 458,136
Corey Bracey v. County of Huntingdon, et al
as 15-3127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY BRACEY
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF HUNTINGDON, JUDGE STEWART L. KURTZ, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
and others
USA v. Fremo Santana
as 15-3103
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FREMO SANTANA, a/k/a Manuel Gierbolini
Type:
Other Statutes
Other
Nathan Clouser v. Todd Johnson, et al
as 15-3109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN W. CLOUSER
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD JOHNSON, REGIS VOGLE, JOHN GOSHERT
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Unknown "SIS" Federal Agents, et al
as 15-3112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. BITENER, CAPT. AEYES, ASST. WARDEN C. DYNAN
and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 15-3113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Warden Fort Dix FCI, et al
as 15-3114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
A. W. WASOM, C/O GOBOAVICH, OIC STALLINGS
and others
USA v. Robert Scott, Sr.
as 15-3126
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT SCOTT, SR., a/k/a Big Rob
Fitbit Inc. v. AliphCom
as 1:2015cv00775
Plaintiff:
Fitbit Inc.
Defendant:
AliphCom
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Type:
Intellectual Property
Patent
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3128
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re The Application of Kate
as 15-3129
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KATE O'KEEFFE
Defendant - Appellee:
KIRK A. THORELL
Not Party - Appellant:
SHELDON G. ADELSON, LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP
Advertisement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.