The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20150905133246/https://dockets.justia.com/browse/state-maine/noscat-6

District of Maine Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 728
RSS Feed | View as table
ALLEN v. USA
as 1:2015cv00361
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: EUGENE ERWIN ALLEN, JR
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GAGNON v. FITZPATRICK et al
as 1:2015cv00355
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BEAUCHENE v. HARPER et al
as 1:2015cv00354
Plaintiff: DONALD BEAUCHENE
Defendant: JAY HARPER, RIVERVIEW PSYCHIATRIC CENTER, MARY MAYHEW
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ASSELIN v. FITZPATRICK et al
as 2:2015cv00342
Plaintiff: SHAWN ASSELIN
Defendant: JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, SCOTT MCCAFFERY, SCOTT LANDRY and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
MACHIAVELLI v. ABBOTT JR et al
as 1:2015cv00340
Plaintiff: ANTHONY MACHIAVELLI
Defendant: HAROLD ABBOTT JR, TROY ROSS, ANTONIO MENDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
MUTTY v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv00329
Plaintiff: DANIEL E MUTTY
Defendant: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, RODNEY BOUFFARD and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. CARR et al
as 2:2015cv00293
Plaintiff: JOHN R TAYLOR
Defendant: SUSAN CARR, MARIAN ZIMMERMAN
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
DEMOS v. UNITED STATES PRESIDENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00284
Plaintiff: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR
Defendant: UNITED STATES PRESIDENT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RICHARDS v. USA
as 2:2015cv00287
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: ARNOLD D RICHARDS, III
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ADAMS v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2015cv00282
Plaintiff: JON R ADAMS
Defendant: SCOTT LANDRY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, SCOTT MCCAFFERY and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
1 2 3 4 5 … Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.