Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 110,672
RSS Feed | View as table
Cole v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2016cv00311
Petitioner: Jerome Maurice Cole
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Fountain v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv01098
Plaintiff: Lanny Shane Fountain
Defendant: Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Warden, Choice More Unit
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2016cv00580
Petitioner: Michael Louis Sanders
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rosendo Rodriguez, III v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-70020
Petitioner - Appellant: ROSENDO RODRIGUEZ, III
Respondent - Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Prudencio v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2016cv01096
Petitioner: Ramon Prudencio
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks v. TDCJ
as 2:2016cv00865
Petitioner: Jeremy Lee Hicks
Defendant: TDCJ
Cause Of Action: s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jermaine Surtain v. J. Barnhart
as 16-30894
Petitioner - Appellant: JERMAINE SURTAIN
Respondent - Appellee: J. A. BARNHART, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Pollock
Eddie Brown v. Raymond Byrd, et al
as 16-60536
Plaintiff - Appellant: EDDIE JOSEPH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee: DOCTOR CHARMAINE MCCLEAVE, MELICIA BOOSE, MARY SCOGGINS and others
Toan Tang v. State of Texas
as 16-20522
Plaintiff - Appellant: TOAN T. TANG
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS
Guidry v. River Bend Detention Center et al
as 2:2016cv13558
Plaintiff: Robert John Guidry, Jr
Defendant: River Bend Detention Center, Louisiana State
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?