Third Circuit Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 492,183
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al v. Accord Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01311
Plaintiff:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Aventisub LLC , Sanofi
and others
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare, Inc., Accord Healthcare Ltd., Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
NM, LLC v. Purch Group, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01310
Plaintiff:
NM, LLC
Defendant:
Purch Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: e Job Discrimination (Employment)
In re: Kenneth Senoski
as 16-4363
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH A. SENOSKI
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
In re: Gerald Bennett
as 16-4382
Petitioner:
In re: GERALD BENNETT
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
USA v. Andrew Alexander
as 16-4371
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDREW ALEXANDER
Edson Arneault, et al v. Kevin O'Toole, et al
as 16-4375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDSON R. ARNEAULT, GREGORY J. RUBINO
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PASSPORT REALTY
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN F. O'TOOLE, E. BARRY CREANY, PHILIP J. RENDIN
and others
Hayward Miller v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm
as 16-4376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAYWARD MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
USA v. Maurice Peppers
as 16-4380
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICE PEPPERS, a/k/a Nedric Cain
In Re: Shop-Vac Marketing
as 16-4370
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EMANUELE DIMARE, DEBORAH BLAYLOCK, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, ALAN MCMICHAEL, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SHOP VAC CORP, LOWES HOME CENTERS INC, LOWES HIW INC
and others
Not Party - Appellant:
MICHELLE W. VULLINGS

Advertisement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Advertisement