Ninth Circuit Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 697,054
RSS Feed | View as table
Jose Cervantes-Rodriguez v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-73997
Petitioner: JOSE AARON CERVANTES-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Jose Garcia-Vallejo v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-74013
Petitioner: JOSE GARCIA-VALLEJO, AKA Jorge Castillo, AKA Jorge Castillo-Juarez, AKA Roberto Lara, AKA Rodrigo Lara, AKA Roberto Lara-Gonzalez, AKA Carlos Padilla Nunez, AKA Carlos Padilla-Nunez, AKA Jose Garcia Vallejo
Respondent: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Luis Guerra-Mejia v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-74017
Petitioner: LUIS ALFREDO GUERRA-MEJIA
Respondent: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
USA v. Pablo Carrillo, Jr.
as 16-10535
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: PABLO CARRILLO, Jr., AKA Pablo Carillo
Desmen Lankford v. Suzanne Peery
as 16-17344
Petitioner - Appellant: DESMEN LANKFORD
Respondent - Appellee: SUZANNE M. PEERY, Warden
Margaret Mable v. United States District Court f, et al
as 16-36080
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARGARET MABLE
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Michael Wilson v. Superior Court for County of L
as 16-74003
: In re: MICHAEL J. WILSON
Petitioner: MICHAEL J. WILSON
Respondent: SUPERIOR COURT FOR COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, JENNIFER SCHAFER
KWAI CHO v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv07371
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Manuel Villalobos Rubalcava v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-74016
Petitioner: MANUEL VILLALOBOS RUBALCAVA, AKA Manuel Villalobo Ruvalcaba
Respondent: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Robert Cotton v. County of San Bernardino, et al
as 16-56898
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT A COTTON
Defendant - Appellee: COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a political subdivision, SCOTT ABERNATHY, as Sheriff's Deputy, JOHN MCMAHON, as Sheriff and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?