District of Nebraska Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 2,289
RSS Feed | View as table
Moss v. Frakes
as 8:2016cv00479
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. USA
as 8:2016cv00475
Petitioner: Refugio M. Perez
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Espinoza v. USA
as 4:2016cv03164
Petitioner: Andrew Jose Espinoza
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. Frakes
as 4:2016cv03162
Respondent: Scott R. Frakes
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner: William E. Smith
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin v. Frakes et al
as 8:2016cv00470
Defendant: Fred Britten, Bruns, Busboom and others
Plaintiff: Joshua G. Franklin, Sr.
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Echerivel v. USA
as 8:2016cv00469
Petitioner: Olga Echerivel
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Strawder v. Frakes et al
as 4:2016cv03160
Respondent: Scott R. Frakes, Neb Dept Corr Services, State of Nebraska
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner: Thomas Duane Strawder
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strawder v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2016cv03161
Defendant: Scott R. Frakes, Secretary of State John Gale, Neb Attorney Gen Douglas J. Peterson and others
Plaintiff: Thomas Duane Strawder
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Ditter v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv03159
Defendant: Correct Care Solutions, Scott Frakes, Randy T. Kohl and others
Plaintiff: David Ditter
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Frakes We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2016cv00468
Petitioner: Barry Fletcher
Respondent: Scott Frakes
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?