Third Circuit Labor Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 17,901
U.A. LOCAL 322 PENSION FUND et al v. AFL-CIO et al
as 1:2016cv07827
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Derrick Askew v. R.L. Reppert, Inc., et al
as 16-3924
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK ASKEW, for himself and as representative of similarly situated employees
Defendant - Appellee:
RL REPPERT INC, RICHARD REPPERT, TIMOTHY J. REPPERT
and others
Third Party - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA PENSION ADMINISTRATORS & CONSULTANTS INC, KISTLER TIFFANY BENEFITS CORP
AKTAS v. JEFFERSON HILL INC et al
as 2:2016cv07826
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
TRUSTEES OF THE NEW JERSEY B.A.C. HEALTH FUND et al v. J. SCROFANI CONSTRUCTION CORP.
as 2:2016cv07742
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
LURTY v. MILLER REMODELING LLC et al
as 1:2016cv07715
Plaintiff:
Mark Lurty
Defendant:
Miller Remodeling LLC, Enic Miller, Peter Miller
Cause Of Action: Fair Labor Standards Act
Young Scholars of Pennsylvania Education Association v. Young Scholars of Central Pennsylvania Charter School
as 4:2016cv02126
Plaintiff:
Young Scholars of Pennsylvania Education Association
Defendant:
Young Scholars of Central Pennsylvania Charter School
Cause Of Action: Employee Pension Plan
TRUSTEES OF THE SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION LOCAL 27 ANNUITY, HEALTH & WELFARE, EDUCATION AND UNEMPLOYMENT FUNDS et al v. BURRIS CONSTRUCTION OF NEW JERSEY, LLC.
as 1:2016cv07725
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
POLISANO v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv07662
Plaintiff:
CHERYL POLISANO
Defendant:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
KOLLAR v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv07589
Plaintiff:
DAVID M KOLLAR
Defendant:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Advertisement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Advertisement