Featured Story

Amazon Fails to Delay Union Vote at Alabama Warehouse

The National Labor Relations Board rejected efforts by the corporate giant to postpone an election or prevent employees from voting remotely, which echoed Amazon's previous attempts to hinder unionization at its facilities. Read More.

Recently Featured Dockets

Nelson v. Robinhood Financial LLC et al (filed 1/28/21)
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York


Latinos for Trump v. Sessions (filed 1/18/21)
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas


Parler LLC v. Amazon Web Services Inc (filed 1/11/21)
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington


Gohmert et al v. Pence (filed 12/27/20)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas


WISCONSIN VOTERS ALLIANCE et al v. PENCE et al (filed 12/22/20)
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Other Legal News

Ilyse Hogue Reflects on the Future of Roe v. Wade
The New York Times, February 8, 2021

In an interview, Ms. Hogue discussed a tumultuous era for abortion rights and the future of Roe v. Wade.


Supreme Court Partly Backs Religious Challenge to California Covid Restrictions
The New York Times, February 6, 2021

The ruling followed a similar one in a case from New York and provided more evidence of a change in the court’s direction after the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.


Divided court favors judicial review of agency decision on railroad worker benefits
SCOTUSblog, February 5, 2021

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court issued its first 5-to-4 decision in an argued case of the 2020-21 term — though not in a hot-button constitutional case, but in a narrow statutory dispute about jurisdiction. The question in Salinas v. U.S. Railroad Retirement Board concerned the... The post Divided court favors judicial review of agency decision on railroad worker benefits appeared first on SCOTUSblog.


The Excessive Complexity of Federal Court Gatekeeping Law
Justia's Verdict, February 3, 2021

Cornell law professor Michael C. Dorf explains why Trump v. Sierra Club, a challenge to President Trump’s border wall currently pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, exemplifies the needless complexity of federal court gatekeeping law. Professor Dorf lists the various legal doctrines that restrict access to the federal courts and argues that their number and complexity tend to undercut, rather than serve, justice.


Supreme Court Test for Biden: How Boldly to Disavow Trump’s Agenda
The New York Times, February 1, 2021

New administrations are generally cautious about changing their predecessors’ legal positions. But this time may be different.


Press Release Regarding February Oral Argument Session
Supreme Court of the United States, January 22, 2021