On request, the court must instruct that the prosecution has the burden of proving
the lawfulness of an arrest beyond a reasonable doubt. (People v. Castain (1981)
122 Cal.App.3d 138, 145 [175 Cal.Rptr. 651].)
If lawful performance is an issue, give the bracketed paragraph on lawful
performance and the appropriate portions of CALCRIM No. 2670, Lawful
Performance: Peace Offıcer. When giving the portion of CALCRIM No. 2670 on
the âuse of force,â the court must either delete the following sentence or specify
that this sentence does not apply to a charge of violating Penal Code section 148:
âIf a person knows, or reasonably should know, that a peace officer is arresting or
detaining him or her, the person must not use force or any weapon to resist an
officerâs use of reasonable force.â (People v. White, supra, 101 Cal.App.3d at pp.
168-169 [court must clarify that Pen. Code, § 834a does not apply to charge under
section 148].)
If the prosecution alleges multiple, distinct acts of resistance, the court has a sua
sponte duty to instruct on unanimity. (People v. Moreno (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d
Supp. 1, 9 [108 Cal.Rptr. 338].) Give CALCRIM No. 3500, Unanimity, if needed.
The jury must determine whether the alleged victim is a peace officer. (People v.
Brown (1988) 46 Cal.3d 432, 444-445 [250 Cal.Rptr. 604, 758 P.2d 1135].) The
court may instruct the jury on the appropriate definition of âpeace officerâ from the
statute (e.g., âa Garden Grove Regular Police Officer and a Garden Grove Reserve
Police Officer are peace officersâ). (Ibid.) However, the court may not instruct the
jury that the alleged victim was a peace officer as a matter of law (e.g., âOfficer
Reed was a peace officerâ). (Ibid.) If the alleged victim is a police officer, give the
bracketed sentence that begins with âA person employed as a police officer.â If the
alleged victim is another type of peace officer, give the bracketed sentence that
begins with âA person employed by.â
The court may give the bracketed sentence that begins with âThe duties of a
<insert title . . . > includeâ on request. The court may insert a
description of the alleged victimâs duties such as âthe correct service of a facially
valid search warrant.â (People v. Gonzalez (1990) 51 Cal.3d 1179, 1222 [275
Cal.Rptr. 729, 800 P.2d 1159].)
If the facts indicate passive resistance to arrest, give the bracketed sentence that
begins with âIf a person goes limp.â (In re Bacon (1966) 240 Cal.App.2d 34, 53 [49
Cal.Rptr. 322].)
AUTHORITY
⢠Elements. Pen. Code, § 148(a); see In re Muhammed C. (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th
1325, 1329 [116 Cal.Rptr.2d 21].
⢠General-Intent Crime. In re Muhammed C. (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 1325, 1329
[116 Cal.Rptr.2d 21].
⢠Knowledge Required. People v. Lopez (1986) 188 Cal.App.3d 592, 599-600
[233 Cal.Rptr. 207].
⢠Multiple Violations Permissible If Multiple Officers. Pen. Code, § 148(e).
CALCRIM No. 2656 CRIMES AGAINST GOVERNMENT
552