The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20210908050418/http://ilreports.blogspot.com/2021_09_05_archive.html

Tuesday, September 7, 2021

Steffek: International Organization as Technocratic Utopia

Jens Steffek
(Technical Univ. of Darmstadt) has published International Organization as Technocratic Utopia (Oxford Univ. Press 2021). Here's the abstract:

As climate change and a pandemic pose enormous challenges to humankind, the concept of expert governance gains new traction. This book revisits the idea that scientists, bureaucrats, and lawyers, rather than politicians or diplomats, should manage international relations. It shows that this technocratic approach has been a persistent theme in writings about international relations, both academic and policy-oriented, since the 19th century. The technocratic tradition of international thought unfolded in four phases, which were closely related to domestic processes of modernization and rationalization. The pioneering phase lasted from the Congress of Vienna to the First World War. In these years, philosophers, law scholars, and early social scientists began to combine internationalism and ideals of expert governance. Between the two world wars, a utopian period followed that was marked by visions of technocratic international organizations that would have overcome the principle of territoriality. In the third phase, from the 1940s to the 1960s, technocracy became the dominant paradigm of international institution-building. That paradigm began to disintegrate from the 1970s onwards, but important elements remain until the present day. The specific promise of technocratic internationalism is its ability to transform violent and unpredictable international politics into orderly and competent public administration. Such ideas also had political clout. This book shows how they left their mark on the League of Nations, the functional branches of the United Nations system and the European integration project.

New Issue: Journal of Conflict & Security Law

The latest issue of the Journal of Conflict & Security Law (Vol. 26, no. 2, Summer 2021) is out. Contents include:
  • Marten Zwanenburg, Keeping Camouflage Out of the Classroom: The Safe Schools Declaration and the Guidelines for Protecting Schools and Universities from Military Use During Armed Conflict
  • Dieter Fleck, The Interplay Between ‘Peacetime’ Law and the Law of Armed Conflict: Consequences for Post-Conflict Peacebuilding
  • Christopher P. Evans, Going, Going, Gone? Assessing Iran's Possible Grounds for Withdrawal from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
  • Nathan Derejko, A Forever War? Rethinking the Temporal Scope of Non-International Armed Conflict
  • Fikire Tinsae Birhane, Targeting of Children in Non-International Armed Conflicts
  • Solon Solomon, The Psychological Impact of Military Operations on Civilians and the UN Human Rights Committee Japalali Decision: Exploring Mental Anguish under a Vida Digna, Right to Life Prism
  • Neil McDonald & Anna McLeod, ‘Antisocial Behaviour, Unfriendly Relations’: Assessing the Contemporary Value of the Categories of Unfriendly Acts and Retorsion in International Law

Moyn: Humane: How the United States Abandoned Peace and Reinvented War

Samuel Moyn
(Yale Univ. - Law) has published Humane: How the United States Abandoned Peace and Reinvented War (Farrar, Straus and Giroux 2021). Here's the abstract:

In the years since 9/11, we have entered an age of endless war. With little debate or discussion, the United States carries out military operations around the globe. It hardly matters who’s president or whether liberals or conservatives operate the levers of power. The United States exercises dominion everywhere.

In Humane: How the United States Abandoned Peace and Reinvented War, Samuel Moyn asks a troubling but urgent question: What if efforts to make war more ethical—to ban torture and limit civilian casualties—have only shored up the military enterprise and made it sturdier? To advance this case, Moyn looks back at a century and a half of passionate arguments about the ethics of using force. In the nineteenth century, the founders of the Red Cross struggled mightily to make war less lethal even as they acknowledged its inevitability. Leo Tolstoy prominently opposed their efforts, reasoning that war needed to be abolished, not reformed—and over the subsequent century, a popular movement to abolish war flourished on both sides of the Atlantic. Eventually, however, reformers shifted their attention from opposing the crime of war to opposing war crimes, with fateful consequences.

The ramifications of this shift became apparent in the post-9/11 era. By that time, the US military had embraced the agenda of humane war, driven both by the availability of precision weaponry and the need to protect its image. The battle shifted from the streets to the courtroom, where the tactics of the war on terror were litigated but its foundational assumptions went without serious challenge. These trends only accelerated during the Obama and Trump presidencies. Even as the two administrations spoke of American power and morality in radically different tones, they ushered in the second decade of the “forever” war.

Humane is the story of how America went off to fight and never came back, and how armed combat was transformed from an imperfect tool for resolving disputes into an integral component of the modern condition. As American wars have become more humane, they have also become endless. This provocative book argues that this development might not represent progress at all.

Sunday, September 5, 2021

New Issue: Humanity

The latest issue of Humanity (Vol. 12, no. 2, Summer 2021) is out. Contents include:
  • Sharif Youssef, Refugees and the Rise of the Novel: Trespass, Necessity, and Humanitarian Casuistry in the Long Refugee Crisis
  • Karin Loevy, The Balfour Declaration’s Territorial Landscape: Between Protection and Self-Determination
  • Yakov Feygin, Dreaming of a “New Planning”: Development and the Internationalization of Economic Thought in Late Soviet Reformist Politics
  • Anna Grimaldi, European Media Coverage of Brazil’s New Human Rights: 1964–1985
  • Benjamin P. Davis, The Promises of Standing Rock: Three Approaches to Human Rights
  • Ben Golder, Critiquing Human Rights

New Issue: The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals

The latest issue of The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (Vol. 20, no. 2, 2021) is out. Contents include:
  • Freya Baetens & Régis Bismuth, Face à Face: Interview with Angelika Nussberger – Professor and Former Judge and Vice-President of the European Court of Human Rights
  • Rebecca Brown, Invoking International Environmental Norms Through Treaty Interpretation
  • Katayoun Hosseinnejad, Rethinking the Meaning of Ordinary Meaning in Light of the ICJ’s Jurisprudence
  • Andrés Sarmiento Lamus & Rodrigo González Quintero, The Practice of Appending Declarations at International Courts and Tribunals
  • Kacper Zajac, The Rights of the Accused under the Rome Statute and the US Bill of Rights: Has 20 Years of ICC Jurisprudence Brought Those Together?
  • Yoshifumi Tanaka, Between the Law of the Sea and Sovereign Immunity: Reflections on the Jurisdiction of the Annex VII Arbitral Tribunal in the Enrica Lexie Incident Case
  • Fernando Lusa Bordin, Procedural Developments at the International Court of Justice