Advertisement
Subscribe to Justia's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court opinions.
Subscribe NowDistrict Court Cases in Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 143,728
Southwood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00278
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Southwood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Long v. Adcare Employee Leasing, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00277
Plaintiff:
Colleen Long
Defendant:
Adcare Employee Leasing, LLC, UVMC Nursing Care, Inc. doing business as Koester Pavilion
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JEFFERIES v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04982
Plaintiff:
RASHIQUE JEFFERIES
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mulholland v. Hamilton County, Ohio/Hamilton County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2021cv00647
Plaintiff:
Sean Mulholland
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Ohio/Hamilton County Board of Commissioners, Esq. Steve Tolbert, Ashley Vogelpohl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OSAFO v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04983
Plaintiff:
ELLIOTT OSAFO
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Eminger v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01902
Plaintiff:
Andrew Eminger
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
RITCHIE et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04985
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE KENNETH RITCHIE, MARLENE W. RITCHIE
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reynoso v. Carter et al
as 4:2021cv01898
Plaintiff:
Agustin Nunez Reynoso
Defendant:
Lieutenant Carter, John and/or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Advertisement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Advertisement
