District Court Cases in Pennsylvania

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 402,066
RSS Feed | View as table
PIERCE et al v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv00183
Plaintiff: JOSEPH PIERCE and JACKALYN PIERCE
Defendant: TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
VERTICAL BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF DOYLESTOWN, BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00494
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 33
JONES v. VAUGHN, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1999cv04718
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILSON v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00177
Plaintiff: DAVESTIANA WILSON
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. RUFFENACH et al
as 2:2022cv00190
Plaintiff: STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant: CATHERINE RUFFENACH and GERARD RUFFENACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
RONAK FOODS, LLC et al v. GUPTA et al
as 2:2022cv00191
Respondent: SANJAY GUPTA and RAMNIK CHOPRA
Petitioner: RONAK FOODS, LLC, PANDYA RESTAURANTS, LLC, JNP FOODS, LLC and others
KHAWAJA v. BAY MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00182
Plaintiff: MOHSIN KHAWAJA
Defendant: BAY MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC f/k/a Bay Management Group Philadelphia, LLC d/b/a Bay Property Management Group and DANA ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00188
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
GRANGE INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. Shoemaker
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff: GRANGE INSURANCE COMPANY and Jasmin Chebboni
Defendant: Tami Lynn Shoemaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Nellson v. U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00963
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?