LeDure v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 596 U.S. ___ (2022)

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

_________________

No. 20–807

_________________

BRADLEY LeDURE, PETITIONER v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit

[April 28, 2022]

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

December 10, 2020 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 14, 2021)
December 28, 2020 Brief amici curiae of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail Transportation Workers, et al. filed.
January 10, 2021 Certificate of service filed with respect to amici curiae brief of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail Transportation Workers, et al..
January 10, 2021 Certificate of compliance filed with respect to brief amici curiae brief of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail Transportation Workers, et al. .
January 27, 2021 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
February 1, 2021 Waiver of right of respondent Union Pacific Railroad Company to respond filed.
February 8, 2021 Response Requested. (Due March 10, 2021)
March 2, 2021 Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 10, 2021 to April 9, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
March 3, 2021 Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 9, 2021.
April 9, 2021 Brief of respondent Union Pacific Railroad Company in opposition filed.
April 23, 2021 Reply of petitioner Bradley LeDure filed. (Distributed)
April 27, 2021 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
May 17, 2021 The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration of this petition.
November 9, 2021 Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
November 23, 2021 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
December 15, 2021 Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
January 26, 2022 Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 7th Circuit.
January 28, 2022 ARGUMENT SET FOR Monday, March 28, 2022.
January 31, 2022 Brief of Bradley LeDure submitted.
January 31, 2022 Joint Appendix submitted.
January 31, 2022 Brief of petitioner Bradley LeDure filed.
January 31, 2022 Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
January 31, 2022 Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
February 7, 2022 Amicus brief of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail Transportation Workers, the Brotherhood of Lo submitted.
February 7, 2022 Amicus brief of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail Transportation Workers, the Brotherhood of Lo submitted.
February 7, 2022 Amicus brief of United States submitted.
February 7, 2022 Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
February 7, 2022 Amicus brief of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail Transportation Workers, the Brotherhood of Lo not accepted for filing.(Corrected version submitted) (February 09, 2022)
February 7, 2022 Brief amici curiae of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail Transportation Workers-Transportation Division, et al. filed.
January 31, 2022 The record from the U.S.C.A. 7th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.
February 11, 2022 CIRCULATED
February 15, 2022 The record from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of Illinois is electronic and located on Pacer.
March 2, 2022 Brief of Union Pacific Railroad Company submitted.
March 2, 2022 Brief of respondent Union Pacific Railroad Company filed. (Distributed)
January 10, 2021 Certificate of service filed with respect to amici curiae brief of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail Transportation Workers, et al.
February 7, 2022 Amicus brief of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail Transportation Workers, et al. not accepted for filing.(Corrected version submitted) (February 09, 2022)
March 7, 2022 Motion of United States for leave to participate in oral argument and for divided argument submitted.
March 7, 2022 Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed.
March 9, 2022 Amicus brief of Association of American Railroads submitted.
March 9, 2022 Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America submitted.
March 9, 2022 Brief amicus curiae of Association of American Railroads filed. (Distributed)
March 9, 2022 Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. (Distributed)
March 18, 2022 Reply of Bradley LeDure submitted.
March 18, 2022 Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
March 18, 2022 Reply of petitioner Bradley LeDure filed. (Distributed)
March 28, 2022 Argued. For petitioner: David C. Frederick, Washington, D. C.; and Colleen E. Sinzdak, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: J. Scott Ballenger, Washington, D. C.
April 28, 2022 Adjudged to be AFFIRMED by an equally divided Court. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Opinion per curiam.
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.