District Court Cases in New Hampshire
Cases 1 - 10 of 13,367
Avila Gonzalez v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2022cv00540
Petitioner:
Epaminodas Avila Gonzalez
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sederquest v. USA
as 1:2022cv00541
Petitioner:
Eric Sederquest
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Brady v. Sumski

as 1:2022cv00272
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Allen v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Allen, Jr.
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dancy v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2022cv00538
Petitioner:
Dure Dancy
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Thomas v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2022cv00539
Petitioner:
Victor Darnell Thomas
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Armendariz et al v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Fernando Armendariz, Miriam Trebino, Matthew Breedon and others
Defendant:
Sig Sauer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doe et al v. Google, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
Google, LLC, KMT Wireless, LLC doing business as Cynergy, Entities 1 - 99 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Abrams v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2022cv00532
Petitioner:
Mardell Abrams
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Krieg v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2022fp00533
Petitioner:
Eric Krieg
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Advertisement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Advertisement