Ninth Circuit Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,056,331
Poffenbarger v. Key Bank Corporation, Keycorp et al
as 3:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jeff Poffenbarger
Defendant:
Key Bank Corporation, Keycorp, Paula Frackman and Christopher M Gorman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Werder v. State of Alaska
as 3:2023cv00050
Petitioner:
Derek Todd Werder
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearce #042170 v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J Pearce
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott v. Babcock
as 2:2023cv00381
Plaintiff:
Harlan Verle Elliott
Defendant:
Kristina Babcock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Flores v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00382
Petitioner:
Angel Flores
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moreno-Vasquez v. USA
as 4:2023cv00108
Petitioner:
Rey David Moreno-Vasquez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Salisbury v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00109
Petitioner:
Christopher M Salisbury
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Unknown Party et al
as 4:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
John Luther Williams
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Unknown Rodriguez and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition

Advertisement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Advertisement