Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 401,485
West v. Warden Neeley
as 7:2023cv00383
Petitioner:
April West
Respondent:
Warden Neeley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martinez v. Neely
as 7:2023cv00386
Petitioner:
Maria D Jesus Martinez
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WAMPLER v. ZATECKY
as 2:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
SCOTT D. WAMPLER
Respondent:
ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Dallas County
as 4:2023cv00239
Petitioner:
Steven Ray Robertson
Respondent:
Dallas County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eversole v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00108
Petitioner:
Rex Eversole
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Patrick v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00232
Petitioner:
Steven Randall Patrick
Defendant:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ingram v. Searls
as 2:2023cv00230
Petitioner:
David L. Ingram
Respondent:
Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Payne
as 4:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Gary Lewis Brown
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)McKenna v. Cueva
as 2:2023cv00556
Petitioner:
Timothy Patrick McKenna
Respondent:
D. Cueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carrillo-Lovato-Segura v. Attorney General of Colorado et al
as 1:2023cv00751
Petitioner:
Marina Carrillo-Lovato-Segura
Respondent:
Attorney General of Colorado, Jefferson County Jail, Adams County Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Advertisement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Advertisement