The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20230509215611/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18982835/
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008;45(2):95-106.

Is lithium a real teratogen? What can we conclude from the prospective versus retrospective studies? A review

Sarah Yacobi  1 , Asher Ornoy
Affiliations
  • PMID: 18982835
Free article
Review

Is lithium a real teratogen? What can we conclude from the prospective versus retrospective studies? A review

Sarah Yacobi et al. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2008.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Lithium is a drug used mainly for the treatment of Bipolar Disorder (BD). Case reports and several retrospective studies have demonstrated possible teratogenicity, but the data in the different studies was inconclusive.

Methods: We summarized all published studies in English, including case reports.

Results: We found 24 case reports, of which six infants had congenital anomalies, five having cardiac anomalies, one of them being Ebstein's anomaly. In the retrospective studies there were, in the Lithium Baby Registry, 225 registered cases with 25 anomalies, 18 of them being cardiac, of which six had Ebstein's anomaly. An additional retrospective study on 59 cases found seven anomalies, four of them being cardiac. On the other hand, none of the prospective studies (296 liveborn infants) demonstrated any increase in the rate of congenital anomalies, although two had Ebstein's anomaly. All case control studies regarding Ebstein's anomaly were negative, and among 222 infants with Ebstein's anomaly and 44 with tricuspid atresia none of the mothers had taken lithium during pregnancy.

Conclusions: Considering the serious limitations of the retrospective and case control studies that are also retrospective, lithium does not seem to be a significant teratogen, and hence should be given, if indicated, in pregnancy. It is, however, advisable to perform a fetal echocardiography to exclude the possibility of cardiac anomalies. Lamotrigine seems to be a possible alternative.

Comment in

  • Lithium and pregnancy.
    Feldman M. Feldman M. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2008;45(4):300-1; author reply 301. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2008. PMID: 19452657 No abstract available.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

LinkOut - more resources