It has been a year of increased political tension between the United States, Mexico and Canada â but in eight yearsâ time the three countries will unite to host one of the worldâs biggest sporting spectacles.
At a FIFA association member vote in Moscow Wednesday, the joint North American bid won the right to host the 2026 World Cup, comfortably beating rivals Morocco in the vote.
It will be the first time the World Cup will be shared by three host nations, but since the unified bid was announced in April 2017 political relationships between the US and its proposed co-hosts have been touchy at times.
US President Donald Trump called Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau âmeek and mildâ in a tweet over a tariff dispute following a G7 meeting earlier in June, while tariffs imposed on Mexico along with plans for a border wall have also ruffled feathers south of the border.
Soon after the result was announced, Trump tweeted: âThe U.S., together with Mexico and Canada, just got the World Cup. Congratulations - a great deal of hard work!â
The United Bid promises to bring all three nations closer together for what will be the largest edition of the tournament to date â 48 countries will compete â and the most lucrative. The North American bidâs revenue forecast was $14.3 billion, with a record profit of $11 billion for FIFA, the sportâs governing body.
âHosting the 2026 FIFA World Cup is a rare and important moment to demonstrate that we are all truly united through sport,â said Carlos Cordeiro, President of US Soccer and Co-Chair of the United Bid, in Moscow.
The last time the US hosted a menâs World Cup was in 1994, and Mexico in 1986. Canada has never previously hosted World Cup matches, though it has staged a womenâs World Cup.
The vote, in which all FIFA associations were, for the first time, eligible to vote for the host, was cast at the 68th FIFA Congress on the eve of the 2018 edition of the tournament, which begins Thursday.
The United Bid won by a 134-65 margin, with one vote for âneitherâ host. Seven federations â the four bidding nations along with three US dependent territories â recused themselves.
After the controversial award of the 2018 and 2022 tournaments to Russia and Qatar respectively, FIFA promised a âmore open and transparentâ vote this time.
Previous hosts had been decided by the FIFA Executive committee, now known as the FIFA Council.
Football powerhouses Brazil, Italy, the Netherlands and France backed the losing bid, as did China, while Iran was the country that voted for âneither,â while Spain, Slovenia and Cuba abstained.
Under the North America proposal, 60 of the tournamentâs matches will be held in the US, including everything from the quarterfinals onwards, while Mexico and Canada will host 10 games each.
Geoff Hurst, 1966 —
Did it cross the line? With the scores between England and West Germany level at 2-2 in the 1966 World Cup final, striker Geoff Hurst's shot hit the crossbar and deflected downwards. At first a goal wasn't given, but then allowed after consultation between the referee and linesman. The game ended 4-2, securing England's first and only World Cup victory.
STAFF/AFP/AFP/Getty Images
Pele, 1970 —
Brazil's 100th World Cup goal, celebrated wildly by Pele, who jumped into the air with joy as his side took the lead in the final against Italy. The game ended 4-1 to Brazil -- their third World Cup victory.
STAFF/AFP/AFP/Getty Images
Dutch great Johan Cruyff scored three goals in the 1974 World Cup, twice against Argentina in the second round and then against Brazil in a 2-0 win that sent Holland through to the final.
Harald Schumacher, 1982 —
An ugly moment. German goalkeeper Harald Schumacher clattered into France's Patrick Battiston, who was through on goal, knocking him unconscious at the 1982 semifinal in Spain. Schumacher was unmoved as his opponent was stretchered off the field.
STAFF/AFP/AFP/Getty Images
Diego Maradona, 1986 —
"The Hand of God" needs little introduction. England vs. Argentina, the quarterfinal of the 1986 World Cup in Mexico. A mis-hit clearance was heading into the hands of goalkeeper Peter Shilton, before a leaping Diego Maradona intercepted it with his hand, punching the ball into the net. The game ended 2-1, with Argentina going on to win the World Cup.
STAFF/AFP/AFP/Getty Images
Roger Milla, 1990 —
One of the greatest ever World Cup celebrations. Roger Milla turned on the style at the 1990 World Cup in Italy, which saw his Cameroon team reach the quarterfinals -- the furthest an Africa team has ever gone in the competition.
STAFF/AFP/AFP/Getty Images
Andres Escobar, 1994 —
An own-goal by Colombia's Andres Escobar had tragic consequences. Less than a week after seeing his team eliminated from the competition due to his error, Escobar was shot dead on the streets of Medellin, a murder linked to drug lords who lost huge amounts of money on the result.
STAFF/AFP/AFP/Getty Images
A Dutch master at work ... Dennis Bergkamp stops Frank de Boer's pass dead, transferring the ball to his left foot as he twists past Argentina's Roberto Ayala. His third touch, again with his right boot, flicks it past Carlos Roa, the keeper. Three perfect touches to take the ball from a speculative punt upfield to what remains one of the ultimate moments of skill ever displayed in a World Cup.
STAFF/AFP/AFP/Getty Images
2006, Zinedine Zidane —
A rush of blood to the head. With the 2006 World Cup final moving into extra-time, goalscorer Marco Materazzi muttered a few words to France legend Zinedine Zidane, who returned with a headbutt to the Italian's chest. In his last ever professional match, Zidane was red carded and Italy went on to win on penalties.
STAFF/AFP/AFP/Getty Images
Luis Suarez, 2010 —
Another South American -- this time Uruguayan Luis Suarez -- another handball. This one, however, was less subtle. Suarez's hands prevented Ghana from bagging a winner in extra-time. He saw red, and Asamoah Gyan's whacked the resulting penalty against the bar. Uruguay went on to win on penalties.
STAFF/AFP/AFP/Getty Images
Brazil vs. Germany, 2014 —
One of the biggest humiliations the World Cup has ever seen. Brazil has struggled for form throughout the tournament, which was being played on home soil for the first time in 64 years, and met an impressive German side in the semifinals. But few could have predicted what was to follow: a 7-1 demolition by the visitors, who went on to lift the World Cup trophy.
STAFF/AFP/AFP/Getty Images
From headbutts to the 'Hand of God': 11 moments that defined the World Cup
Fraught relations
As well as trade tensions, there had also been worries that President Trumpâs travel ban blocking immigration from several Muslim-majority countries â which is being challenged in the US Supreme Court â could affect fans, officials and players.
However, Trump has promised FIFA that foreign teams, officials and fans will be able to travel to the US.
The United bid shared with CNN Sport a letter sent to FIFA in March by the US government which said it âintends to issue visas, subject to eligibility under U.S. law, without regard to race, skin color, ethnic, national or social origin, gender, language, religion, political opinion or any other opinion, disability, wealth, birth or any other status, or sexual orientation.â
The statement said that the bid organizers were confident that âevery eligible fan and member of our FIFA family will have unhindered access to our country to experience and celebrate the 2026 FIFA World Cup.â
And despite political differences, the World Cup bid has given the US, Canada and Mexico a common cause, with the North American bid having received the full support of their governments.
Indeed, Trump courted controversy in April with comments made about the vote.
âThe US has put together a STRONG bid w/ Canada & Mexico for the 2026 World Cup,â Trump tweeted.
âIt would be a shame if countries that we always support were to lobby against the U.S. bid.
âWhy should we be supporting these countries when they donât support us (including at the United Nations)?â
The tweet caused FIFA to direct attention to the organizationâs ethics rules governing the bid process and âto the Bid Rules of Conduct incorporated therein,â a spokesman said.
The outcome of the vote had been expected, despite a tightening of the race in recent days.
Ahead of Wednesdayâs ballot, the âUnitedâ bid from North America came out on top in a FIFA evaluation, with various aspects including stadiums, accommodation, transport and organizing costs factored in.
Out of five, the joint bid got a score of four, while the Moroccan bid scored just 2.7, with the North African bid deemed âhigh riskâ in three areas because of a lack of infrastructure to host the 80-game tournament.
The United Bid also estimated double the profits that the Morocco bid had calculated â $10 billion to $5 billion for the North African nation.
Morocco had said it needed to spend almost $16 billion (£12 billion) on infrastructure while the North American bidâs revenue forecast ($14.3bn) far outstripped what Morocco had to offer ($7.2bn).
In addition to its low evaluation score, FIFAâs evaluation of the Morocco bid also raised concerns about the potential treatment of the LGBT community.
âThere is a risk of discrimination based on sexual orientation as a consequence of the countryâs legislation on the matter,â the FIFA assessment said.
Regarding sexual orientation, the North American bid pledged to use its leverage to reduce the risk of discrimination and harassment in Mexico and the US in particular.