Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2010 May 31;30(1):149–160. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2009.10.007

Dengue Virus

Ted M Ross 1
PMCID: PMC7115719  PMID: 20513545

Abstract

Dengue is the most prevalent arthropod-borne virus affecting humans today. The virus group consists of 4 serotypes that manifest with similar symptoms. Dengue causes a spectrum of disease, ranging from a mild febrile illness to a life-threatening dengue hemorrhagic fever. Breeding sites for the mosquitoes that transmit dengue virus have proliferated, partly because of population growth and uncontrolled urbanization in tropical and subtropical countries. Successful vector control programs have also been eliminated, often because of lack of governmental funding. Dengue viruses have evolved rapidly as they have spread worldwide, and genotypes associated with increased virulence have spread across Asia and the Americas. This article describes the virology, epidemiology, clinical manifestations and outcomes, and treatments/vaccines associated with dengue infection.

Keywords: Dengue virus, Flavivirus, Infection, Clinical diagnosis, Vaccines

Overview

Dengue fever (DF), the most prevalent arthropod-borne viral illness in humans, is caused by the dengue virus (DENV). The 4 serotypes of DENV (DENV 1-4) are transmitted to humans primarily by the Aedes aegypti mosquito (Fig. 1 ).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The A aegypti mosquito is the most common epidemic vector for spread of dengue virus. It can be identified by the white bands or scale patterns on its legs and thorax.

Courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/dengue.

DENV is a member of the Flaviviridae family and is related to the viruses that cause yellow fever and the Japanese, St. Louis, and West Nile encephalitides.1 Infection by DENV causes a spectrum of clinical diseases that range from an acute debilitating, self-limited febrile illness, DF, to a life-threatening hemorrhagic and capillary leak syndrome of dengue hemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome (DHF/DSS). DENV causes an estimated 25 to 100 million cases of DF and 250,000 cases of DHF per year worldwide, with 2.5 billion people at risk of infection.2, 3 At present, no approved antiviral treatment or vaccine is in use, and therapy is supportive in nature (Fig. 2 ).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

World map indicating regions with known risks of dengue infection.

Courtesy of CDC, available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/dengue.

Epidemic DHF was first recognized in the 1950s in Southeast Asia, and by 1975 it had become a leading cause of hospitalization and death among children in many countries in that region. In the 1980s, DHF began a second expansion into Asia, and in countries where DHF is endemic, the epidemics have become progressively larger over the last 15 years (Box 1 ). In 1980, the first indigenous transmission of dengue in the United States in more than 40 years occurred. Later, infections also occurred in Texas. In 2001 to 2002, a dengue outbreak occurred in Hawaii spread by Aedes albopictus mosquitoes.

Box 1. Recent dengue virus infections in the United States.

  • Texas:
    • 1980: 23 cases, first locally acquired since 1945
    • 1986: 9 cases
    • 1995: 7 cases
    • 1997: 3 cases
    • 1998: 1 case
    • 1999: 18 cases
    • 2005: 25 cases
  • Hawaii:
    • 2001 to 2002: 122 cases (first since 1944)

The Americas have seen the most dramatic rise in the emergence of dengue cases (Fig. 3 ). The mosquito vector for dengue was eradicated in most of the region as part of the Pan American Health Organization's yellow fever eradication campaign in the 1950s and 1960s. The A aegypti eradication program was officially discontinued in the United States and other Western Hemisphere regions, leading to reinfestation of the mosquito vector in most countries during the 1980s and 1990s. By 1997, the geographic distribution of A aegypti was wider than its distribution before the eradication program. Dengue is now endemic in much of the Western Hemisphere. Hyperendemicity, the presence of multiple circulating serotypes, is widespread in most countries and epidemics caused by multiple serotypes are more frequent.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Reinfestation of A aegypti in the Americas Unfortunately, the success of the eradication campaign was not sustained. Beginning in the early 1970s, it began to be disbanded, and many countries channeled their limited resources into other areas. Consequently, A aegypti began to reinfest the countries from which it had been eradicated. Comparing the 1970 and 2006 maps, the mosquito is seen reestablishing itself throughout Central America and most of South America. As the mosquito has spread, the number and frequency of dengue epidemics have increased, as has dengue hemorrhagic fever activity in the Americas.

Courtesy of CDC, available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/dengue.

Virology

DENV is an enveloped virus with a single-stranded, positive-sense 10.7 kilobase RNA genome,4 which is translated as a single polyprotein and then cleaved into 3 structural proteins (capsid [C], premembrane/membrane [prM/M], and envelope [E]) and 7 nonstructural (NS) proteins by virus- and host-encoded proteases. The 3 structural components are required for capsid formation (C) and assembly into viral particles (prM and E). The NS proteins contain a serine protease and ATP-dependent helicase (NS3), which is required for virus polyprotein processing, a methyltransferase and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (NS5), and a cofactor for the NS3 protease (NS2B). NS4B has been implicated in blocking the interferon (IFN) response. NS1, NS2A, and NS4A have either unknown or incompletely understood functions. All the NS proteins appear to be necessary for efficient replication.

In primary DENV infection, the virus enters target cells after the E protein adheres to cell surface receptors, such as dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN) on dendritic cells.5 Viral uptake occurs by receptor-mediated endocytosis. Endosomal acidification induces a conformational change in the E protein, resulting in fusion of the viral and endosomal membranes and nucleocapsid release into the cytoplasm.6, 7 Virus genome replication occurs in discrete domains within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Virus assembly occurs at the ER, and virions are exocytosed via Golgi-derived secretory vesicles.8

Epidemiology

Following the bite of a mosquito, usually A aegypti or A albopictus,2 DENV can cause a range of mild-to-severe illnesses. The mosquito eradication program, which was officially discontinued in the United States in 1970, gradually weakened elsewhere, and the mosquito began to reinfest countries from which it had been eradicated. Consequently, the geographic distribution of A aegypti in 2002 was much wider than that before the eradication program and there was a corresponding increase in dengue infections. There are 4 distinct serotypes of DENV. Primary infection with one DENV serotype provides lifelong immunity to that specific serotype. However, when an individual is infected with a different serotype of DENV, there is an increased risk of severe dengue disease.9 This can occur with all 4 serotypes; therefore, in regions with multiple endemic serotypes, the risk of severe disease is higher.

Pathogenesis

The pathogenesis of DHF/DSS, the most severe form of DENV infection, reflects a complex interplay of the host immune response and the viral determinants of virulence.2, 10, 11 Epidemiologic studies have suggested an immune system linkage, because there is an increased risk of DHF with secondary DENV infection and in children within the first year of life born to DENV-immune mothers.12, 13, 14, 15 From these observations, the hypothesis of antibody-dependent immune enhancement (ADE) of infection emerged. In support of the ADE pathogenesis concept, antibody enhancement of DENV infection in monocytes in vitro correlated with increased risk of DHF,15, 16 and peak viremia was increased in patients with severe secondary DENV infection.17, 18 Differences in specific genetic determinants among viral isolates19, 20, 21 may also affect virulence, because some DENV strains fail to cause severe disease.22, 23 Finally, a pathologic cytokine response that occurs after extensive T-cell activation may contribute to the capillary leak syndrome associated with DHF.11 Elevated levels of cytokines, including IFN-γ, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-γ, and interleukin (IL)-10, to some extent correlate with severe disease24, 25, 26, 27, 28; and disease severity has been associated with activation of CD8+ T cells and the expansion of serotype-reactive low-affinity DENV-specific T cells that produce high levels of vasoactive cytokines.29, 30, 31, 32, 33

Clinical presentations

Dengue fever may present in many forms: as an undifferentiated febrile illness with a maculopapular rash, particularly in children, as flulike symptoms, or as classic Dengue with 2 or more symptoms, such as fever, headache, bone or joint pain, muscular pain, rash, pain behind the eyes, and petechial hemorrhaging. Often, there is prolonged fatigue and depression. During dengue epidemics, hemorrhagic complications may also appear, such as bleeding from the gums, nosebleeds, and bruising. Case fatalities due to DF are low, whereas DHF mortality is fairly high. There is no specific treatment for dengue fever except for symptomatic treatment, rest, and rehydration. Recognizing the warning signs and symptoms of dengue infection are critical for appropriate diagnosis and treatment (Fig. 4 ).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Warning signs of dengue infection.

Courtesy of CDC, available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/dengue.

DHF is characterized by spontaneous bleeding, plasma leakage, fever, and thrombocytopenia. Four clinical manifestations need to be observed to be classified as DHF. These include (1) fever; (2) hemorrhagic episodes with the presence of at least one of the following: a positive tourniquet test result (also called a capillary fragility test: a clinical diagnostic method to determine a patient's hemorrhagic tendency and assess fragility of capillary walls); petechiae, ecchymoses, or purpura; or bleeding from mucosa, gastrointestinal tract, injection sites, or others; (3) plasma leakage due to increased capillary permeability; and (4) thrombocytopenia (100,000/mm3 or less). Moderate-to-marked thrombocytopenia with concurrent hemoconcentration is a distinctive clinical laboratory finding of DHF. However, to distinguish DHF from DF, an observation of plasma leakage manifested by a rising hematocrit value (ie, hemoconcentration) must be observed (Fig. 5 ).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Petechial hemorrhages from a dengue infected patient.

Courtesy of CDC, available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/dengue.

The normal course of DHF lasts between 7 to 10 days, and with appropriate intensive maintenance of the circulating fluid volume, mortality may be reduced to less than 1%. Only severe DF and DHF cases should be hospitalized. Serologic tests are necessary to confirm cases of dengue. However, these tests may take several days.34, 35 Developing countries may not have the resources to perform these expensive confirmatory assays, and therefore, many suspected cases of dengue are not fully diagnosed. In severe cases of DHF, the patient's condition may suddenly deteriorate after a few days of fever; the temperature drops, followed by signs of circulatory failure; and the patient may rapidly go into a critical state of shock (dengue shock syndrome), dying within 12 to 24 hours or quickly recovering following appropriate volume replacement therapy Box 2 .

Box 2. Grades of DHF.

  • All 4 grades must be met for a diagnosis of DHF.

  • Grade 1: Fever and nonspecific constitutional symptoms and positive tourniquet test result

  • Grade 2: Grade 1 manifestations plus spontaneous bleeding.

  • Grade 3a: Incipient shock with signs of circulatory failure.

  • Grade 4a: Profound shock with undetectable pulse and blood pressure.

a Grades 3 and 4 are Dengue Shock Syndrome.

DSS is the most severe form of DHF and is characterized by the presence of all 4 DHF clinical manifestations and circulatory failure. All 3 manifestations of circulatory failure must be present: rapid and weak pulse; narrow pulse pressure or hypotension for the patient's age; and cold, clammy skin and altered mental state.

Diagnosis

Establishing a laboratory diagnosis of dengue infection is critical for diagnosis of dengue. A major challenge for disease surveillance and case diagnosis is that the dengue viruses produce asymptomatic infections and a spectrum of clinical illness ranging from a mild, nonspecific febrile illness to fatal hemorrhagic disease. Important risk factors of DHF include the strain and serotype of the infecting virus and the age, immune status, and genetic predisposition of the patient. The most common method of detecting the virus is to propagate virus from serum in cell culture or detect antidengue antibodies by serology. Virus can be cultured in vitro or by detection of viral RNA and specific dengue virus antigens. Countries that do not have access to sophisticated laboratory tests rely on identification of early clinical or simple laboratory indicators that can provide a reliable diagnosis of dengue before hospitalization. Early distinction between dengue and other febrile illnesses could help identify patients that should be monitored for signs of DHF.

Differential diagnosis

Febrile illnesses, such as measles, typhoid fever, leptospirosis, and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), can produce symptoms similar to DF.36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 At presentation, these illnesses may share similar clinical features, including headache, myalgia, and rash Box 3 .

Box 3. Differential diagnosis of dengue infection.

  • Influenza

  • Measles

  • Rubella

  • Malaria

  • Typhoid fever

  • Leptospirosis

  • Meningococcemia

  • Rickettsial infections

  • Bacterial sepsis

  • Other viral hemorrhagic fevers

Treatment and long-term outcomes

There are no specific antivirals that can eliminate the virus from an infected individual. However, supportive care and treatment can be effective in treating DF. Paracetamol and other antipyretics can be used to treat fever. Bone pain should be treated by analgesics or painkilling tablets. During episodes of DHF/DSS, the mortality rate in the absence of hospitalization can be as high as 50%. With proper treatment, such as intravenous fluid replacement, the mortality rate is greatly reduced.

Vaccines and immunity

Multiple correlates of protection have been described for dengue. However, the primary correlate seems to be long-term homotypic protection.42, 43 Most protective antibodies are directed at the surface E glycoprotein.44, 45 However, antibodies to the M and NS1 proteins show some protective efficacy.46 Passively transferring antibodies from seroconverted animals results in decreased infection and disease following challenge.44, 46 In addition, maternal antibodies decrease disease in infants.15, 47 Using in vitro neutralization assays, antibodies directed against the E protein prevent virus infection.48 Antibodies that block viral attachment or prevent fusion to target cells neutralize virus infection.49, 50 In addition to neutralization, antibodies that mediate cell-mediated cytotoxicity reduce virus infection in complement-independent51, 52 and complement-dependent mechanisms.53 Cellular immune responses are generally weakly protective.54 However, these responses are critical for viral clearance.55, 56 Innate immune responses directed against NS proteins, such as NS4B (a putative IFN antagonist), seem to mediate viral escape.57

Currently, no DENV vaccine is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Four related but serologically distinct DENVs can cause disease. Non-neutralizing, cross-reactive antibodies may contribute to DHF pathogenesis via antibody-dependent enhancement. Therefore, an effective vaccine must induce high-titer neutralizing antibodies against all 4 strains58, 59; failure to do so could increase the risk of severe disease on natural challenge. To circumvent this problem, tetravalent live-attenuated candidate vaccines are in varying stages of development.60, 61, 62, 63, 64 In clinical trials, tetravalent serologic responses were observed in some individuals, but many do not develop high titer neutralizing antibodies despite multiple immunizations.65, 66 Additionally, each part of the tetravalent vaccine does not elicit high titer immune response leading to immunodominance. Subunit-based vaccines, as purified proteins or DNA plasmid, are alternative vaccine strategies. Repeated immunization of purified recombinant DENV domain III of the E protein (DIII) or DIII-encoding plasmids induced protective antibodies in mice, albeit at fairly low neutralizing titers.67, 68, 69, 70, 71

Live attenuated vaccines and nonreplicating vaccines, such as inactivated virus vaccines, viruslike particles, and DNA vaccines, have been developed for dengue (Table 1 ). These vaccines elicit protective neutralizing antibodies. These vaccines can elicit long-lasting immunity against the specific serotype of DENV. However, they are poorly cross-reactive against infection with another subtype of DENV.

Table 1.

Experimental dengue virus vaccines

Type Sponsor Stage of Development
Live attenuated
Tetravalent Mahidol University/Sanofi Pasteur Phase I
Tetravalent WRAIR/GSK Phase II
Chimeric
ChimeriVax (17D YF) Acambis/Sanofi Pasteur Phase I
DENV-2/4d30 (all serotypes) NIAID, NIH Phase I/II
DENV-1 US FDA Phase I
DENV-2 (16,681, PDK53) CDC/Inviragen Preclinical
DNA
Several approaches Various
(ie, Domain III, prM/E, NS1) NMRC/University of Pittsburgh Phase I/Preclinical
Inactivated
Several approaches WRAIR Preclinical
Subvirion particles/viruslike particles
Drosophila cells Hawaii Biotech Phase I
Baculovirus (E, NS1) Various Preclinical
Replication-defective AV (E) RepliVax-UTMB/Acambis Preclinical
Yeast (C/prM/E, E-IIBsAg) Various Preclinical
Escherichia coli (E, E-NS1) Various Preclinical
DNA University of Pittsburgh Preclinical
Subunit/recombinant Various Preclinical

Abbreviations: AV, adenovirus; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; GSK, GlaxoSmithKline; NIAID, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; NIH, National Institutes of Health; UTMB, University of Texas Medical Branch; WRAIR, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research; YF, yellow fever.

Footnotes

Funding Support: TMR is supported by research awards, W81XWH-BAA-06-1 and W81XWH-BAA-06-2, from the United States Department of Defense.

References

  • 1.Burke D.S., Monath T.P. Flaviviruses. In: Knipe D.M., Howley P.M., editors. Fields virology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia: 2001. pp. 1043–1125. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Halstead S.B. Pathogenesis of dengue: challenges to molecular biology. Science. 1988;239:476–481. doi: 10.1126/science.3277268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Monath T.P. Dengue: the risk to developed and developing countries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:2395–2400. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chambers T.J., Hahn C.S., Galler R. Flavivirus genome organization, expression, and replication. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1990;44:649–688. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.44.100190.003245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tassaneetrithep B., Burgess T., Granelli-Piperno A. DC-SIGN (CD209) mediates dengue virus infection of human dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 2003;197(7):823–829. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Heinz F., Auer G., Stiasny K. The interactions of the flavivirus envelope proteins: implications for virus entry and release. Arch Virol. 1994;9(S):339–348. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-9326-6_34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Heinz F., Stiasny K., Puschner-Auer G. Structural changes and functional control of the tick-borne encephalitis virus glycoprotein E by the heterodimeric association with the protein prM. Virology. 1994;198:109–117. doi: 10.1006/viro.1994.1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mackenzie J.M., Jones M.K., Westaway E.G. Markers for trans-Golgi membranes and the intermediate compartment localize to induced membranes with distinct replication functions in flavivirus-infected cells. J Virol. 1999;73:9555–9567. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.11.9555-9567.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Solomon T., Mallewa M. Dengue and other emerging flaviviruses. J Infect. 2001;42:104–115. doi: 10.1053/jinf.2001.0802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rothman A.L. Dengue: defining protective versus pathologic immunity. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:946–951. doi: 10.1172/JCI21512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rothman A.L., Ennis F.A. Immunopathogenesis of Dengue hemorrhagic fever. Virology. 1999;257:1–6. doi: 10.1006/viro.1999.9656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Halstead S.B., Simasthien P. Observations related to the pathogenesis of dengue hemorrhagic fever. II. Antigenic and biologic properties of dengue viruses and their association with disease response in the host. Yale J Biol Med. 1970;42:276–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Halstead S.B., Nimmannitya S., Cohen S.N. Observations related to pathogenesis of dengue hemorrhagic fever. IV. Relation of disease severity to antibody response and virus recovered. Yale J Biol Med. 1970;42:311–328. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Halstead S.B. Global epidemiology of dengue hemorrhagic fever. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1990;21:636–641. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kliks S.C., Nimmanitya S., Nisalak A. Evidence that maternal dengue antibodies are important in the development of dengue hemorrhagic fever in infants. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1988;38:411–419. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1988.38.411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kliks S.C., Nisalak A., Brandt W.E. Antibody-dependent enhancement of dengue virus growth in human monocytes as a risk factor for dengue hemorrhagic fever. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1989;40:444–451. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1989.40.444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Libraty D.H., Endy T.P., Houng H.S. Differing influences of virus burden and immune activation on disease severity in secondary dengue-3 virus infections. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:1213–1221. doi: 10.1086/340365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vaughn D.W., Green S., Kalayanarooj S. Dengue viremia titer, antibody response pattern, and virus serotype correlate with disease severity. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:2–9. doi: 10.1086/315215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Leitmeyer K.C., Vaughn D.W., Watts D.M. Dengue virus structural differences that correlate with pathogenesis. J Virol. 1999;73:4738–4747. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.6.4738-4747.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cologna R., Rico-Hesse R. American genotype structures decrease dengue virus output from human monocytes and dendritic cells. J Virol. 2003;77:3929–3938. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.7.3929-3938.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pryor M.J., Carr J.M., Hocking H. Replication of dengue virus type 2 in human monocyte-derived macrophages: comparisons of isolates and recombinant viruses with substitutions at amino acid 390 in the envelope glycoprotein. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;65:427–434. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2001.65.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Watts D.M., Porter K.R., Putvatana P. Failure of secondary infection with American genotype dengue 2 to cause dengue haemorrhagic fever. Lancet. 1999;354:1431–1434. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04015-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Messer W.B., Vitarana U.T., Sivananthan K. Epidemiology of dengue in Sri Lanka before and after the emergence of epidemic dengue hemorrhagic fever. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;66:765–773. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2002.66.765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Green S., Vaughn D.W., Kalayanarooj S. Early immune activation in acute dengue illness is related to development of plasma leakage and disease severity. J Infect Dis. 1999;179:755–762. doi: 10.1086/314680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hober D., Poli L., Roblin B. Serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) in dengue-infected patients. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993;48:324–331. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1993.48.324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hober D., Nguyen T.L., Shen L. Tumor necrosis factor alpha levels in plasma and whole-blood culture in dengue-infected patients: relationship between virus detection and pre- existing specific antibodies. J Med Virol. 1998;54:210–218. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9071(199803)54:3<210::aid-jmv12>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hober D., Delannoy A.S., Benyoucef S. High levels of sTNFR p75 and TNF alpha in dengue-infected patients. Microbiol Immunol. 1996;40:569–573. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1996.tb01110.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bethell D.B., Flobbe K., Cao X.T. Pathophysiologic and prognostic role of cytokines in dengue hemorrhagic fever. J Infect Dis. 1998;177:778–782. doi: 10.1086/517807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mongkolsapaya J., Duangchinda T., Dejnirattisai W. T cell responses in dengue hemorrhagic fever: are cross-reactive T cells suboptimal? J Immunol. 2006;176:3821–3829. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.6.3821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mongkolsapaya J., Dejnirattisai W., Xu X.N. Original antigenic sin and apoptosis in the pathogenesis of dengue hemorrhagic fever. Nat Med. 2003;9:921–927. doi: 10.1038/nm887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Green S., Pichyangkul S., Vaughn D.W. Early CD69 expression on peripheral blood lymphocytes from children with dengue hemorrhagic fever. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:1429–1435. doi: 10.1086/315072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zivna I., Green S., Vaughn D.W. T cell responses to an HLA-B∗07-restricted epitope on the dengue NS3 protein correlate with disease severity. J Immunol. 2002;168:5959–5965. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.11.5959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bashyam H.S., Green S., Rothman A.L. Dengue virus-reactive CD8+ T cells display quantitative and qualitative differences in their response to variant epitopes of heterologous viral serotypes. J Immunol. 2006;176:2817–2824. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.5.2817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schwartz E., Mileguir F., Grossman Z. Evaluation of ELISA-based sero-diagnosis of dengue fever in travelers. J Clin Virol. 2000;19:169–173. doi: 10.1016/s1386-6532(00)00114-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schwartz E., Moskovitz A., Potasman I. Changing epidemiology of dengue fever in travelers to Thailand. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;19:784–786. doi: 10.1007/s100960000388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Flannery B., Pereira M.M., Velloso L.D.F. Referral pattern of leptospirosis cases during a large urban epidemic of dengue. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;65:657–663. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2001.65.657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Watt G., Jongsakul K., Chouriyagune C. Differentiating dengue virus infection from scrub typhus in Thai adults with fever. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68:536–538. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2003.68.536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Karande S., Gandhi D., Kulkarni M. Concurrent outbreak of leptospirosis and dengue in Mumbai, India, 2002. J Trop Pediatr. 2005;51:174–181. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmh100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dietz V.J., Nieburg P., Gubler D.J. Diagnosis of measles by clinical case definition in dengue-endemic areas: implications for measles surveillance and control. Bull World Health Organ. 1992;70:745–750. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wilder-Smith A., Earnest A., Paton N.I. Use of simple laboratory features to distinguish the early stage of severe acute respiratory syndrome from dengue fever. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:1818–1823. doi: 10.1086/426029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wilder-Smith A., Foo W., Earnest A. Seroepidemiology of dengue in the adult population of Singapore. Trop Med Int Health. 2004;9:305–308. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01177.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sabin A.B. Research on dengue during World War II. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1952;1:30–50. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1952.1.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Halstead S.B. Etiologies of the experimental dengues of Siler and Simmons. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1974;23:974–982. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1974.23.974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kaufman B.M., Summers P.L., Dubois D.R. Monoclonal antibodies against dengue 2 virus E-glycoprotein protect mice against lethal dengue infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1987;36:427–434. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1987.36.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bray M., Zhao B.T., Markoff L. Mice immunized with recombinant vaccinia virus expressing dengue 4 virus structural proteins with or without nonstructural protein NS1 are protected against fatal dengue virus encephalitis. J Virol. 1989;63:2853–2856. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.6.2853-2856.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kaufman B.M., Summers P.L., Dubois D.R. Monoclonal antibodies for dengue virus prM glycoprotein protect mice against lethal dengue infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1989;41:576–580. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1989.41.576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pengsaa K., Luxemburger C., Sabchareon A. Dengue virus infections in the first 2 years of life and the kinetics of transplacentally transferred dengue neutralizing antibodies in thai children. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:1570–1576. doi: 10.1086/508492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Russell P.K., Nisalak A., Sukhavachana P. A plaque reduction test for dengue virus neutralizing antibodies. J Immunol. 1967;99:285–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Crill W.D., Roehrig J.T. Monoclonal antibodies that bind to domain III of dengue virus E glycoprotein are the most efficient blockers of virus adsorption to Vero cells. J Virol. 2001;75:7769–7773. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.16.7769-7773.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Roehrig J.T., Bolin R.A., Kelly R.G. Monoclonal antibody mapping of the envelope glycoprotein of the dengue 2 virus, Jamaica. Virology. 1998;246:317–328. doi: 10.1006/viro.1998.9200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Garcia G., Arango M., Perez A.B. Antibodies from patients with dengue viral infection mediate cellular cytotoxicity. J Clin Virol. 2006;37:53–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Laoprasopwattana K., Libraty D.H., Endy T.P. Dengue Virus (DV) enhancing antibody activity in preillness plasma does not predict subsequent disease severity or viremia in secondary DV infection. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:510–519. doi: 10.1086/431520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Falgout B., Bray M., Schlesinger J.J. Immunization of mice with recombinant vaccinia virus expressing authentic dengue virus nonstructural protein NS1 protects against lethal dengue virus encephalitis. J Virol. 1990;64:4356–4363. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.9.4356-4363.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Calvert A.E., Huang C.Y., Kinney R.M. Non-structural proteins of dengue 2 virus offer limited protection to interferon-deficient mice after dengue 2 virus challenge. J Gen Virol. 2006;87:339–346. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.81256-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bukowski J.F., Kurane I., Lai C.J. Dengue virus-specific cross-reactive CD8+ human cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J Virol. 1989;63:5086–5091. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.12.5086-5091.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kurane I., Meager A., Ennis F.A. Dengue virus-specific human T cell clones. Serotype crossreactive proliferation, interferon gamma production, and cytotoxic activity. J Exp Med. 1989;170:763–775. doi: 10.1084/jem.170.3.763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Munoz-Jordan J.L., Laurent-Rolle M., Ashour J. Inhibition of alpha/beta interferon signaling by the NS4B protein of flaviviruses. J Virol. 2005;79:8004–8013. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.13.8004-8013.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Barrett A.D. Current status of flavivirus vaccines. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;951:262–271. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb02702.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Halstead S.B., Deen J. The future of dengue vaccines. Lancet. 2002;360:1243–1245. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11276-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Guirakhoo F., Arroyo J., Pugachev K.V. Construction, safety, and immunogenicity in nonhuman primates of a chimeric yellow fever-dengue virus tetravalent vaccine. J Virol. 2001;75:7290–7304. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.16.7290-7304.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Huang C.Y., Butrapet S., Pierro D.J. Chimeric dengue type 2 (vaccine strain PDK-53)/dengue type 1 virus as a potential candidate dengue type 1 virus vaccine. J Virol. 2000;74:3020–3028. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.7.3020-3028.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Durbin A.P., Karron R.A., Sun W. Attenuation and immunogenicity in humans of a live dengue virus type-4 vaccine candidate with a 30 nucleotide deletion in its 3'-untranslated region. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;65:405–413. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2001.65.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Markoff L., Pang X., Houng Hs H.S. Derivation and characterization of a dengue type 1 host range-restricted mutant virus that is attenuated and highly immunogenic in monkeys. J Virol. 2002;76:3318–3328. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.7.3318-3328.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bhamarapravati N., Sutee Y. Live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine. Vaccine. 2000;18(Suppl 2):44–47. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(00)00040-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Edelman R., Wasserman S.S., Bodison S.A. Phase I trial of 16 formulations of a tetravalent live-attenuated dengue vaccine. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;69:48–60. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2003.69.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sun W., Edelman R., Kanesa-thasan N. Vaccination of human volunteers with monovalent and tetravalent live-attenuated dengue vaccine candidates. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;69:24–31. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2003.69.6_suppl.0690024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Khanam S., Etemad B., Khanna N. Induction of neutralizing antibodies specific to dengue virus serotypes 2 and 4 by a bivalent antigen composed of linked envelope domains III of these two serotypes. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74:266–277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mota J., Acosta M., Argotte R. Induction of protective antibodies against dengue virus by tetravalent DNA immunization of mice with domain III of the envelope protein. Vaccine. 2005;23:3469–3476. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.12.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hermida L., Rodriguez R., Lazo L. A dengue-2 Envelope fragment inserted within the structure of the P64k meningococcal protein carrier enables a functional immune response against the virus in mice. J Virol Methods. 2004;115:41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2003.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Simmons M., Nelson W.M., Wu S.J. Evaluation of the protective efficacy of a recombinant dengue envelope B domain fusion protein against dengue 2 virus infection in mice. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;58:655–662. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1998.58.655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Simmons M., Murphy G.S., Hayes C.G. Short report: Antibody responses of mice immunized with a tetravalent dengue recombinant protein subunit vaccine. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;65:159–161. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2001.65.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinics in Laboratory Medicine are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES