Can anyone recommend an intuitive network monitoring tool? I mainly want to capture what devices are streaming audio and video on our network.

Thanks in advance!

Mark

5 Spice ups

What firewall are you running?

This Spolight on IT article might prove to be helpful: http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/222989-top-5-mostly-free-tools-for-monitoring-bandwidth

What kind of system are you wanting to implement this on? Are you comfortable working with Unix/Linux?

I have a Netgear ProSafe VPN Firewall FVS336GV2.

@Will224 - I’d like to just run it on a stand-alone Windows box. My Unix/Linux skills are limited.

I haven’t personally used it, but Solarwind’s free Real-Time Bandwidth Monitor might work.

That just tells you interface rate, it won’t help you figure out who is doing what.

There are apps like Solarwinds free real time bandwidth monitor linked above,

ManageEngine also has free tools here:

If you have no kind of monitoring, I would personally setup the free version of the OpManager software.

Quick setup, allows up to 10 devices for free I believe. Then you can monitor other things like memory/cpu/disk and setup alerts and notifications also.

We use OpManager and spiceworks to monitor our network of roughly 600 devices.

Otherwise since unix/linux skills are limited you have the option of setting up a virtual machine thats mostly pre-configured like fully automated nagios (FAN) or one of its alternatives (Zenoss, Zabbix etc) but then if you need to change/fix something, you would need to figure out some linux stuffz…

messing around with linux a bit in your spare time will do nothing but enable and empower you to do more for free.

if you want to get into the nitty gritty and on the cheap your only real option will be a *nix cacti type solution.

Hi @markdunn - You may want to look into @Sideband Networks ’ solution free for 30 days. Are you looking to achieve anything else with your bandwidth monitor or just use it for intel? The vXRE Virtual Appliance has a single point of management and a real-time graphical interface which will display what devices are streaming audio and video on your network. You can learn more about the product here .

if you have a desktop or laptop w/2 NICs around and usable, I would install the free version of Untangle and give it a try.

yes, it does run on Debian Linux but is about as easy a setup/install as I have ever found, including many windows applications.

1 Spice up

Anything that will do what you ask is going to need an agent installed practically everywhere. What people fail to understand is that when you sniff traffic you can only sniff traffic that is specifically going to/from the Host you are doing the sniffing from (plus any broadcast and maybe some multicast) No one is running hubs anymore,…networks are all switched and switches create virtual circuits between each pair of communicating Hosts, so the only Hosts who know what is leaving and coming into them is the hosts themselves. So the agent has to be on the Host and then reports back to the monitoring station periodically. Anything modeled like this is going to be $$$$$,…and the product will generate a lot of traffic all by itself just doing what it does.

You asked about bandwidth monitoring in the subject but what you are really asking about is network analysis.

BTW - Video and Audio are not the performance killers (this isn’t the 1990’s). Audio and Video travel at the rate they were encoded (plus a little more to fill the buffer),…the rate they are encoded at is measured in kbps,…not the mbps that the cabling runs at,…just to put that into perspective. That is why you can watch a video over an Internet connection that is many times slower than your LAN Cabling. If they were the performance killers that people thought they were then it would be impossible to stream them over an Internet connection.

However the player and file-type being used can matter since some players load the whole file into ram before playing it,…so it is basically a file transfer,…and then “0” traffic once it start playing

The real performance killers are file transfers. It doesn’t matter if it is transferring to/from the internet or between local machines on the LAN,…but file transfers will try to use every bit of bandwidth and throughput that they are given.

1 Spice up

@phillipwindell

You’re answer:

BTW - Video and Audio are not the performance killers (this isn’t the 1990’s). Audio and Video travel at the rate they were encoded (plus a little more to fill the buffer),…the rate they are encoded at is measured in kbps,…not the mbps that the cabling runs at,…just to put that into perspective. That is why you can watch a video over an Internet connection that is many times slower than your LAN Cabling. If they were the performance killers that people thought they were then it would be impossible to stream them over an Internet connection.

Is exactly what I wanted to hear, and document. I have a group of Engineers that are complaining that it takes several seconds to open CAD drawings off of our file server. They, being Engineers, assume that the lag is coming from network related issues, such as streaming, not realizing the fact that their drawings are huge. I forwarded your response to our director of Engineering. I appreciate the input.

Mark, depending on what you’re trying to do and the size of your network (and budget) Exinda is our current go-to best-of-breed (and best price) solution for true application layer bandwidth monitoring and management. We used to recommend PacketShapers (formerly from Packeteer, now from Blue Coat) and those are still great, but Exinda’s customer service, pricing, and features are fantastic. (As a matter of disclosure, my company sells these products and others but regardless where you purchase, it’s good stuff and I highly recommend it).

-jj

@Mark Dunn… I think Philip’s comment deserves to be marked “best
answer” for his contribution, what do you think?

Yes, I always forget to do that. Thanks…

Thanks guys.

…and “several seconds” for a large file to transfer is exactly what I would expect in any network. If your LAN is 10/100 then you could replace equipment with 10/100/100 (Gigabit) capable equipment. Make sure that you have a full Gigabit path between the File Storage and the users,…and make sure the cabling is high quality and in good condition and you will have the best performance that is possible short of putting the CAD workstations directly on a Fiber Channel to a SAN with the files stored on a SAN.