Currently have lame Netgear wireless routers, need to improve Wireless throughout whole Building with Security and manageable options. Looking for a not to expensive device that can cover a 33,284 Sq. Ft. Building in range.<\/p>\n
Any suggestions, comments or recommendations would be greatly appreciated.<\/p>","upvoteCount":11,"answerCount":37,"datePublished":"2012-08-06T10:31:04.000Z","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"atatngie","url":"https://community.spiceworks.com/u/atatngie"},"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"
I have a lot of Meraki networks deploys with customers, and a lot of happy people who keep coming back for more. That being said, when someone is tight on budget, the Ubiquiti Unifi has become my go to because they are solid and cheap.<\/p>\n
We also have used both Ruckus and Meraki internally here, and we actually use the Ruckus exclusively now for the two - factor guest authentication and high density deployment capabilities. We have a mobile broadband station that we bring to all of our events to give everyone WiFi access has Ruckus AP’s that are able to handle the loads we put on them easily. (600+ users on 4 AP’s)<\/p>\n
I have also deployed Meraki MR24’s in McCormick place here in Chicago that had over 15,000 users over the course of 4 days with outstanding results. People were actually impressed with the WiFi. In a space that large, we were able to give great coverage with a really easy deployment. There was one area with seating for 3,300 people covered by 9 AP’s with no issues.<\/p>\n
I now have our old Meraki gear from the office running at home, and waiting on my new MX60 and MR16 from getting the new Meraki Certification CMNA last week.<\/p>\n
So +1 to Meraki for me, but I work with them a lot<\/p>\n
Ruckus is solid as well but still a pricey option<\/p>\n
Ubiquiti is great if you are on a budget<\/p>","upvoteCount":1,"datePublished":"2012-08-07T12:26:45.000Z","url":"https://community.spiceworks.com/t/wireless-access-point-recommendation/158678/28","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"mikehaynes1335","url":"https://community.spiceworks.com/u/mikehaynes1335"}},"suggestedAnswer":[{"@type":"Answer","text":"
Currently have lame Netgear wireless routers, need to improve Wireless throughout whole Building with Security and manageable options. Looking for a not to expensive device that can cover a 33,284 Sq. Ft. Building in range.<\/p>\n
Any suggestions, comments or recommendations would be greatly appreciated.<\/p>","upvoteCount":11,"datePublished":"2012-08-06T10:31:04.000Z","url":"https://community.spiceworks.com/t/wireless-access-point-recommendation/158678/1","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"atatngie","url":"https://community.spiceworks.com/u/atatngie"}},{"@type":"Answer","text":"
Get a bunch of basic wireless 802.11n routers and flash em with DD-WRT.<\/p>","upvoteCount":2,"datePublished":"2012-08-06T10:36:06.000Z","url":"https://community.spiceworks.com/t/wireless-access-point-recommendation/158678/2","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"superbrandon","url":"https://community.spiceworks.com/u/superbrandon"}},{"@type":"Answer","text":"
I’d suggest Meraki but that depends on your definition of not too expensive.<\/p>\n
Your building composition and layout is going to affect your coverage. I have 5 Intermec AP’s in one 40,000 sq ft warehouse but one Meraki MR-16 covering 40,000 sq ft of manufacturing. Once we get into the office areas I can get about 10,000 with an MR-12 horizontally but the steel and concrete floors cause havoc with the signal.<\/p>\n
There’s alternatives to Meraki, someone else will be along shortly…<\/p>","upvoteCount":4,"datePublished":"2012-08-06T10:45:51.000Z","url":"https://community.spiceworks.com/t/wireless-access-point-recommendation/158678/3","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"martinpeverley","url":"https://community.spiceworks.com/u/martinpeverley"}},{"@type":"Answer","text":"
depending on how many access points you’d need, I’d go with the Cisco Wireless Management System, just a rock solid wireless system. It’s not cheap but you get what you pay for, so if you can afford it in the budget, I’d go this way. Also if a guest system is necessary, the Cisco guest network is secure, easy to configure, and easy to deploy. This is not the cisco (Linksys) home crap this is their commercial product. We use it and cover 12 buildings and 600 or so users, with a fiber backbone and have very little trouble at all.<\/p>\n