Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ramu50/Archive

Ramu50

Ramu50 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:

Requests for checkuser/Case/Ramu50

Report date May 12 2009, 21:33 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

75.154.186.241 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Evidence submitted by Letdorf

User:Ramu50 was blocked indefinitely in November 2008 after several instances of persistent disruptive editing and incivility towards other editors. Shortly afterwards, an attempt was made to evade the block from the IP address User:70.79.65.227, which was also blocked. More recently, a user from the (geographically similar) IP address 75.154.186.241 has again started exhibiting similar behavior to Ramu50 (similar article topics, emphasis on navbox templates, using template talk pages as sandboxes etc.) Seems to be a highly probably case of block evasion. Letdorf (talk) 21:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Comments by other users

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Conclusions

IP blocked for two weeks. Tiptoety ^talk 23:11, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Report date June 1 2009, 13:26 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

75.154.186.241 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Evidence submitted by Letdorf

It appears that Ramu50 (talk · contribs) has been evading an indefinite block again via the IP address 75.154.186.241, [1] after a previous block on this IP address expired [2]. The user has also recently added what appears to be a request for unblocking to the archived SPI page for this account. Letdorf (talk) 13:26, 1 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Conclusions

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Reblocked the IP for a month. clerks may wish to tag the IP as related to Ramu50 as it does not appear to be dynamic based on editing behavior. —— nix eagle^{email me} 16:15, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- Someone may also wish to inform the IP and Ramu50 about the proper ways to appeal a block. Evading it is not the correct way however. —— nix eagle^{email me} 16:18, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Report date September 30 2009, 04:56 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

75.154.186.241 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Evidence submitted by DoriSmith

Take the previous sock puppet evidence, combine it with the recent edits from this IP address (some examples: here, here, and here), and all I can say is that Looks like a duck to meDori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 04:56, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Conclusions

Administrator note IP blocked for 3 months with talk page editing disabled. MuZemike 19:23, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.