Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Jun;46(2):239-48.

The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits

M Mancini  1 , F B Horak
Affiliations
Review

The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits

M Mancini et al. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Control of balance is complex and involves maintaining postures, facilitating movement, and recovering equilibrium. Balance control consists of controlling the body center of mass over its limits of stability. Clinical balance assessment can help to assess fall risk and/or determine the underlying reasons for balance disorders. Most functional balance assessment scales assess fall risk and the need for balance rehabilitation but do not differentiate types of balance deficits. A system approach to clinical balance assessment can differentiate different kinds of balance disorders and a physiological approach can determine underlying sensorimotor mechanisms contributing to balance disorders. Objective measures of balance using computerized systems and wearable inertial sensors can bring more sensitive, specific and responsive balance testing to clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The six different balance control systems evaluated with the BESTest (left) and the five physiological mechanisms evaluated with the PPA (right).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Photo of subject wearing an inertial sensor on the lower trunk with arms and feet in a prescribed posture (A) and horizontal acceleration trajectories for two representative subjects, during quiet stance (B) and step initiation (C). Adapted from Mancini, et al, 2009, 2010.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Alexander NB. Postural control in older adults. J.Am.Geriatr.Soc. 1994;42:93–108. - PubMed
    1. Aminian K, Najafi B, Bula C, Leyvraz PF, Robert P. Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured by an ambulatory system using miniature gyroscopes. J.Biomech. 2002;35:689–699. - PubMed
    1. Aminian K, Rezakhanlou K, De AE, Fritsch C, Leyvraz PF, Robert P. Temporal feature estimation during walking using miniature accelerometers: an analysis of gait improvement after hip arthroplasty. Med.Biol.Eng Comput. 1999;37:686–691. - PubMed
    1. Aminian K, Trevisan C, Najafi B, Dejnabadi H, Frigo C, Pavan E, Telonio A, Cerati F, Marinoni EC, Robert P, Leyvraz PF. Evaluation of an ambulatory system for gait analysis in hip osteoarthritis and after total hip replacement. Gait Posture. 2004;20:102–107. - PubMed
    1. Auriel E, Hausdorff JM, Herman T, Simon ES, Giladi N. Effects of methylphenidate on cognitive function and gait in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a pilot study. Clin.Neuropharmacol. 2006;29:15–17. - PubMed