Seventh Circuit Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 265,124
Christopher Cornett v. Charles Daniels
as 16-1612
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CORNETT
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, Warden
Netzer, Randy v. Office Of Lawyer Regulation et al
as 3:2016cv00175
Appellant:
Randy Joseph Netzer
Appellee:
Office Of Lawyer Regulation , Matthew Anich , Wisconsin Department of Revenue
Cause Of Action: Bankruptcy Appeal
Type:
Bankruptcy
Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
ABC Worker's Compensation Insurer v. First Choice Logistics Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00336
Involuntary_plaintiff:
ABC Worker's Compensation Insurer
Defendant:
First Choice Logistics Inc, ACE American Insurance Company, Kurt W Serama
Plaintiff:
Staci L Rudersdorf
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Auto Negligence
Nicole Blow v. Bijora, Inc.
as 16-1608
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NICOLE BLOW
Defendant - Appellant:
BIJORA, INC., an Illinois Corporation, doing business as AKIRA
Jaded Martinez v. Peter Cahue
as 16-1609
Petitioner - Appellant:
JADED MARTINEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
PETER VALDEZ CAHUE
Dawon Jones v. Commissioner of Correction, et al
as 16-1610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWON JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION, BETH WHITAKER, Administrative Law Judge, MICHELLE TIMM, Probation Supervisor
and others
James Stuckey v. Chicago Police Department, et al
as 16-1611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES STUCKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, COOK COUNTY STATE'S ATTORNEY OFFICE, EARL GRINBARG
and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
Salvador Contreras v. Kim Butler
as 16-1613
Petitioner - Appellant:
SALVADOR CONTRERAS
Respondent - Appellee:
KIM BUTLER

Advertisement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?