Hello

i want to check the following help desk document compliance matrix if it supported by spiceworks help desk.

any one can help ?

Regards

Amjad

HELPDESK_TOOL_Compliance_Matrix.docx (31.3 KB)

3 Spice ups

Given how many viruses transmit through doc/docx and other office formats, no sane person is going to download and read that.

Can you give us an overview of your requirements instead

1 Spice up

Agreed with Rod. Take screenshots and embed images into your post.

Dears

please find my requirements below , i need to define what are comply & not comply?

1.11 HELPDESK TOOL

–Workflow–
Ability to support automatic assignment of a record by:

  • Categorization/Type
  • Status
  • Severity, SLA and/or Priority
  • Date and Time (Calendar Routing)
  • Agent/Analyst Skills

Ability to support automatic escalation of a record by:

  • Categorization/Type
  • Status
  • Severity, SLA and/or Priority
  • Date and Time (Calendar Routing)
  • Agent/Analyst Skills

Ability to support automated escalation capabilities, such as
automatic end-of-shift routing

Ability to support both functional and hierarchical
escalation

Ability to edit and display workflows graphically

Ability for tasks to be assigned and managed sequentially or
in parallel

Ability to configure alerts for SLA threshold activity based

Comply or Not Comply

–Workflow–
Ability to support automatic assignment of a record by:

  • Categorization/Type
  • Status
  • Severity, SLA and/or Priority
  • Date and Time (Calendar Routing)
  • Agent/Analyst Skills

Ability to support automatic escalation of a record by:

  • Categorization/Type
  • Status
  • Severity, SLA and/or Priority
  • Date and Time (Calendar Routing)
  • Agent/Analyst Skills

Ability to support automated escalation capabilities, such as
automatic end-of-shift routing

Ability to support both functional and hierarchical
escalation

Ability to edit and display workflows graphically

Ability for tasks to be assigned and managed sequentially or
in parallel

Ability to configure alerts for SLA threshold activity based
on individual preferences

Ability to manage SLA metrics when cases are
assigned/reassigned within workflow

Ability to automate routing of approvals/rejections based
on predefined business rules and roles

Ability to generate unique IDs for service requests,
incidents, problems, changes and release records

–Survey–
Ability to compose a survey/questionnaire that scores
various aspects of the service provided by the service desk

Ability to send out an e-mail/link to customer satisfaction
survey to a customer requesting feedback on support

Ability to generate scores received from a survey activity

–Usability Incident & Problem Process–
Ability to configure the graphical user interface by
dynamically adding windows or fields

Ability for the solution to provide simple, Web-based
graphical user interface

Ability of the solution to enable rapid deployment of new
users and administration of existing users

Ability to configure the graphical user interface based on
individual, group or role-based preferences (colors, layout,
etc.)

Ability to provide industry and ITIL best-practice processes,
categorization and templates embedded in tool

Allows for attaching documents as soft copies and not as
images

Ability to provide configurable incident process and
categorization predefined templates

Ability to provide standard required incident record data
fields

Ability to provide predefined incident process templates
based on industry best practices and/or ITIL

Ability to support distinct incident records and problem
management processes, metrics and reporting

Ability to support hierarchical escalation, either manually or
via business rules, upon incident status change, priority
change and/or service-level clock expiration

Ability of the tool to facilitate the automatic prioritization,
assignment and escalation of Incidents based on the record
categorization

Ability to prevent closure of an incident before all
assignments have been resolved and mandatory fields are
completed

Ability to support bidirectional communication of Incident
information to and from the end user via e-mail

Ability to support highly flexible routing of incidents based
on available resources located across multiple sites and
other factors, such as time of day, tiered service values, etc.

Ability to differentiate between an incident and a service
request

Ability to spawn one or more incident(s) to a problem, and
to link all related incidents to the problem, with
corresponding notifications

Ability to select and create “quick incidents” from a list of
predefined templates with prepopulated content, such as
categorization, text, etc.

Ability to open an Request for Change(RFC) against an
incident, and automatic population of the RFC

Ability to manage and link incident records to multiple SLAs
and tiers of service based on IT customer groups or
associated lines of business

Ability to assist the service technician in determining the
existence of any duplicate, currently open incident or
problem tickets

Ability to search knowledge base for solutions/work-
arounds, and to push knowledge base articles that match
error categorization

Ability to automatically escalate and notify one or more
groups when a change has not been started or completed
on time

Ability to denote particular customers or groups of
customers as “VIP” status, indicating a higher level of
service

Ability to create subtasks within incident records

Ability to integrate with event and alert monitoring tools,
and allow for automatic creation, update and closure of
tickets from these tools

Ability to provide for documenting and managing
knowledge artifacts pertaining to problem and error control
(e.g., data entry point for knowledge management
databases, posting of FAQs)

Ability to integrate with chat tools, remote-control tools
and phone systems

Ability to put incident tickets “on hold,” by status definition,
with time excluded from the SLA/operating-level agreement
(OLA)

Ability to allow for multiple types of alerts (via SMS and e-
mail), including deadline alerts, excessive reassignment
alerts and inactivity alerts

Ability to automatically update status or close all related
incidents to a problem upon updating of status or closure of
the problem

Ability to automate opening of a problem record from an
incident record based on business rules and SLAs

Ability to track the total amount of time the incident was
worked on and how long it was open

Ability to facilitate the creation, modification and closure of
problem records

Ability to assign impact and urgency codes to problem
records

–Knowledge
Management–
Ability to provide knowledge management capabilities by
floating the most relevant hits to the top, in order of closest
match to search

Ease of administering the weighting and relevancy scores
associated with knowledge articles

Ability to launch fast knowledge searches using the
categorization (or partial categorization) selections as key
value search parameters

Ability to create a knowledge article via a fill-in-the-blank
form

Ability to automatically populate a knowledge article into an
incident

Ability to support role-based knowledge items (i.e., a
technical role can access either technical-facing or
customer-facing articles)

The ability to automatically create knowledge management
entries from incident, problem and change modules

Ability to manage full life cycle of knowledge articles
through administration capabilities (e.g., submission,
editing, review, approval, publishing, usage monitoring,
etc.)

Ability for knowledge management database to be
restricted access by role

Ability for tool’s knowledge management database to
search other knowledge bases in environment

Ability to have a rich-text editor (RTE) that supports links
within documents, document-to-document links and
attaching images to documents

Ability to provide automated administration (ease of
adding, editing and maintaining the data, and ability for
end-user submission to require review/approval prior to
posting)

Ability to have a defined workflow process for reviewing
and approving pending knowledge articles that can be
displayed graphically

Ability to make certain fields in the knowledge article
template mandatory

Ability to embed Web links, images and objects into
knowledge articles (e.g., screenshots, etc.)

Ability to support a variety of search methodologies,
including metadata, fuzzy searching, hierarchical/drill-
downs, cross-references, attribute queries, category, Web
and file system external library searches, and to utilize
natural language and proper stemming, and Boolean search
methodology

Ability to allow user feedback to rate/score content for
usefulness related to the inquiry

Self Service
Ability to provide a customer self-service portal where a
customer may access knowledge base articles and FAQs,
submit and update requests, and monitor the status of their
requests

Ability for the end user to search knowledge base for
solution via keyword, Boolean operators and full-text search

Ability to provide a “suggestion box” for soliciting feedback
on process and interface

Ability to associate end users with specific groups, lines of
business, etc., and to tailor presented content, information
and self-service options according to rule-based
“subscriptions” for roles or groups

Ability to provide a list of “top 10” common FAQs searched,
with automated updates based on update rules

Ability to develop, deliver and manage survey of end users
supporting self-service usage

Ability to integrate chat to support self-service usage

Ability to brand self-service portal in line with remaining
intranet and public portals and based on Company brand
guidelines

Comply or Not Comply

–Change Process–
Ability to provide configurable change process and
categorization templates

Provide templated workflow best practices and/or ITIL for
emergency, normal and preapproved change

Provide basic required change record data fields

Ability to document back-out procedures, installation and
turnover documents within the RFC

Ability to prevent closure of a change before all assignments
have been resolved

Ability to relate postimplementation incidents and
problems resulting from an implemented change

Ability to create subactivities or task records for a specific
change record, for separate assignment to an individual,
group or vendor

Ability to calculate an objective risk assessment considering
business impact, affected application/business services
criticality, collision, historical change information, and
compliance with maintenance windows and black-out
periods

Ability to provide proactive notification to stakeholders and
change advisory board (CAB ) members for changes with
critical business impact, collisions and compliancy issues

Ability to provide role-based approval, retracting or
rescheduling of RFCs

Ability to support release and deployment management as
part of the change process

Ability to automatically create a change request for
unauthorized changes to CIs

Ability to integrate forward schedule of changes (FSC) with
Microsoft Exchange calendaring system

Ability to automatically produce the change schedule (FSC)
in an HTML format that can be published to a Web server

Ability to provide a change calendar with scheduled change
viewing by group, and to customize the sorting and filtering
of calendar views

Ability to allow for scheduling of recurring events, such as
certain types of maintenance

Ability to support maintenance, release and moratoriums
(locked status) for freeze windows

Ability to easily identify the affected CIs whenever a change
is made to a particular CI

Ability to automatically generate risk and impact analysis of
multiple RFCs, and provide visual depictions of upstream
and downstream CIs that can be navigated in a
configuration management database (CMDB)

Ability to support a “virtual” CAB (i.e., approvals/issues
submitted and stored electronically)

Ability to select and create “preapproved changes” from a
list of predefined templates with prepopulated content,
such as categorization, text, etc.

Ability to promote one or more RFC(s) to a release, with
corresponding notifications

Provide change workflow feeds into release workflow

Ability to open an RFC against an incident/problem/known
error record, and automatic population of the RFC

–Reporting–
Ability to support generation of problem management
reporting and trending information

Ability to run incident age report

Ability to report incidents linked to problem records

Ability to report time spent and materials used by incidents

Ability to report the number of problems /incidents /
services per period (as selected ie. monthly, weekly, daily
etc.).

Ability to report the number of problems /incidents /
services records reopened

Ability to report the number of assigned problems
/incidents / services with known errors documented

Ability to report the number of Root Cause Analysis reviews
in progress as a percent of total problems logged

Ability to report first-contact resolution rate

Ability to report mean time to resolution

Ability to perform trend analysis of tickets

Ability to easily construct queries and reports from any
combination of database fields; support for real-time
queries at different levels (parent, child, case, subcase)

Ability to provide real-time reporting via graphical and
configurable dashboards

Ability to produce scheduled reports automatically based on
a defined schedule and e-mail to predetermined recipients

Ability to “drill down” on any displayed and selected field, in
detailed or summary-level reports

Ability to select from a list of online reports to run in real-
time against current or archived databases

Ability to integrate with external reporting tools and to
meet company reporting standards

Ability to create ad hoc reports

Ability of vendor to include predefined reports that can be
modified

Ability to export report information into flat file,
spreadsheet and/or database formats

Ability to support the generation of knowledge
management reporting and trending information

Ability to provide reports for failed and successful
knowledge base searches

Ability to provide reports of the usage of all knowledge
management articles

Ability to provide reports on which technicians are involved
in knowledge management articles

Ability to report on usage by end user, location department,
region, etc. on the selfservice functionality

Ability to support the generation of change management
reporting and trending information

Ability to support a real-time dashboard display of
particular changes (at a minimum, emergency and
successful changes)

Ability to report number and percentage of changes
(successful/failed/backed out)

Ability to report percentage of emergency changes

Ability to report total number of changes by time, type,
class and category

Ability to report percentage of changes noted as closed
within five days

Ability to report percentage of changes canceled and/or
rejected

Ability to report incident to change ratios

Ability to report on the business impact of failed changes

Ability to have multiple helpdesk departments. Each
department is independent and has own groups and
technicians

Reports and surveys should be suitable for multiple
departments and multiple helpdesks

Ability to view the history of reports and data and not only
the current

I’m not reading through all that - and it seems like this is a description of what your current system can do, if this is true why are you getting rid of it?

Your best option would be to try Spiceworks for yourself, I would guess not all of your above is in Spiceworks, but only you will know if its suitable or not.